Compare StocksBAC vs URI

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs United Rentals, Inc. (URI): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. URI is fairly valued at $1077, with an intrinsic value of $1023 and a margin of safety of -5%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
URI
United Rentals, Inc.
$1076.81

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
URI
  • United Rentals, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • United Rentals, Inc. scores 70/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
URI
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • FCF yield of 2.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 27.5x is 64% above the historical average of 16.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
URI
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.87B
N/A
FCF Yield
2.77%
13.95
Trailing P/E
27.50
11.13
Forward P/E
19.94
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
12.44%
10.64%
ROE
28.24%
0.00%
Gross Margin
38.39%
1.02
PEG Ratio
1.76
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
1.66
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.27
1.97%
Dividend Yield
0.74%
BAC: 4Ties: 1URI: 3
BACURI

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

URI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
URI
$4.27
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$26.41B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
URI
5.3% Overvalued
Price is 5.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $1076.81
Fair Value: $1022.61
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

URI

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1077?

+14.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +18.4%

The market implies +14.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +18.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
URI
70/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
URI
-2.84
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
URI
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 96.3%Retail & Other 3.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,970
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
URI
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $53,268
SINGH SHIV
Director
$53,268
@ $783.35 · 2026-02-02
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
URI
4
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $28.78M
PINTOFF CRAIG ADAM
Officer
$2.37M
@ $963.00 · 2026-04-27
GROSS JOLI LYN
Officer
$292,227
@ $954.99 · 2026-04-27
LIMOGES ANDREW B
Officer
$535,868
@ $977.86 · 2026-04-24
FLANNERY MATTHEW JOHN
Chief Executive Officer
$22.43M
@ $984.98 · 2026-04-24
GRACE WILLIAM E.
Chief Financial Officer
$1.18M
@ $791.26 · 2026-02-03
DURAND MICHAEL DUANE
Chief Operating Officer
$1.97M
@ $791.14 · 2026-02-02
GROSS JOLI LYN
Officer
$250,138
@ $725.04 · 2025-05-13
LIMOGES ANDREW B
Officer
$499,752
@ $705.86 · 2025-05-12
DURAND MICHAEL DUANE
Chief Operating Officer
$688,908
@ $626.28 · 2025-04-29
PINTOFF CRAIG ADAM
Officer
$2.82M
@ $633.10 · 2025-04-28
GRACE WILLIAM E.
Chief Financial Officer
$701,908
@ $638.10 · 2025-02-24
LEOPOLD ANTHONY S
Officer
$740,918
@ $823.24 · 2024-10-28
GROSS JOLI LYN
Officer
$248,400
@ $690.00 · 2024-08-02
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
URI
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
URI
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
View BAC Full AnalysisView URI Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs URI

Is Bank of America Corporation or United Rentals, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to URI's -5.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $1023 vs. $1077).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or United Rentals, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while URI scores 70/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. URI scores 3.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or United Rentals, Inc.?

URI earns 12.4% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or United Rentals, Inc.'s?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to URI's 76/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.