Compare StocksBAC vs UAL

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. UAL is undervalued at $109, with an intrinsic value of $622 and a margin of safety of 83%. Of the two, UAL has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.73
VS
UAL
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
$108.54

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
UAL
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 27.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.19 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
UAL
  • FCF yield of 7.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 6.50 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.38 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
UAL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$2.56B
N/A
FCF Yield
7.26%
13.33
Trailing P/E
10.16
10.91
Forward P/E
7.36
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
5.46%
11.20%
ROE
23.25%
0.00%
Gross Margin
31.82%
0.90
PEG Ratio
6.50
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
1.02
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.40
2.21%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
BAC: 2Ties: 1UAL: 5
BACUAL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UAL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UAL
$2.61
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$9.12B
Δ Market Cap
+$23.85B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.73
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UAL
85.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 85.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $108.54
Fair Value: $732.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

UAL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $109?

+4.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.0%

The market implies +4.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +8.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UAL
44/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UAL
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UAL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 90.7%Retail & Other 8.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,439
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UAL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UAL
7
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $49.20M
NOCELLA ANDREW P
Officer
$585,000
@ $117.00 · 2026-08-25
NOCELLA ANDREW P
Officer
$396,900
@ $132.30 · 2026-08-04
LESKINEN MICHAEL D.
Chief Financial Officer
$1.28M
@ $128.19 · 2026-08-03
NOCELLA ANDREW P
Officer
$506,016
@ $120.48 · 2026-07-28
HART BRETT J
President
$3.63M
@ $120.72 · 2026-07-28
ENQVIST TORBJORN J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.40M
@ $119.91 · 2026-07-24
KIRBY JOHN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$18.81M
@ $118.04 · 2026-07-21
KIRBY JOHN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$5.99M
@ $121.29 · 2026-06-16
NOCELLA ANDREW P
Officer
$631,330
@ $90.19 · 2026-05-01
HART BRETT J
President
$2.02M
@ $106.45 · 2026-02-02
KIRBY JOHN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$12.94M
@ $107.86 · 2025-12-03
HARFORD BARNEY
Director
$2.30M
@ $92.84 · 2025-08-12
LESKINEN MICHAEL D.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.10M
@ $91.43 · 2025-07-28
FREYRE MICHELLE
Director
$82,914
@ $92.13 · 2025-07-28
HART BRETT J
President
$2.22M
@ $89.50 · 2025-07-25
ENQVIST TORBJORN J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.84M
@ $92.22 · 2025-07-18
JOJO LINDA P
Officer
$5.71M
@ $95.13 · 2024-11-22
ENQVIST TORBJORN J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.04M
@ $72.00 · 2024-10-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UAL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(43/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
UAL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
View BAC Full AnalysisView UAL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs UAL

Is Bank of America Corporation or United Airlines Holdings, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UAL trades at a 82.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $622 vs. price $109), compared to BAC's 59.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $142 vs. $58).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or United Airlines Holdings, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while UAL scores 44/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. UAL scores 1.4 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or United Airlines Holdings, Inc.?

UAL earns 5.5% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.