Compare StocksBAC vs TSCO

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Tractor Supply Company (TSCO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. TSCO is overvalued at $33, with an intrinsic value of $29 and a margin of safety of -15%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$58.27
VS
TSCO
Tractor Supply Company
$33.05

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.88 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
TSCO
  • Tractor Supply Company has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Tractor Supply Company scores 86/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
TSCO
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.04 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • High leverage (2.40x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
TSCO
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$740.49M
N/A
FCF Yield
4.30%
13.46
Trailing P/E
17.22
11.01
Forward P/E
16.14
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
16.37%
11.20%
ROE
39.51%
0.00%
Gross Margin
36.50%
0.88
PEG Ratio
1.55
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
2.40
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.27
2.21%
Dividend Yield
2.93%
BAC: 3Ties: 1TSCO: 4
BACTSCO

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TSCO

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TSCO
$0.82
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$1.89B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.55B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $58.27
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TSCO
15.3% Overvalued
Price is 15.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $33.05
Fair Value: $28.67
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

TSCO

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $33?

+8.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.0%

The market implies +8.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TSCO
86/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TSCO
-2.60
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TSCO
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 96.8%Retail & Other 2.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,482
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TSCO
4
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $658,321
HAM MARGARET M
Director
$2,975
@ $35.42 · 2026-09-04
MORRIS EDNA K
Director
$50,606
@ $32.44 · 2026-08-04
LAWTON HARRY A III
Chief Executive Officer
$501,524
@ $32.15 · 2026-08-04
HAWAUX ANDRE J
Director
$100,264
@ $31.83 · 2026-08-03
HAM MARGARET M
Director
$2,952
@ $30.43 · 2026-06-08
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TSCO
0
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.96M
YANKEE COLIN
Officer
$618,263
@ $55.35 · 2026-02-13
ESTEP JONATHAN S
Officer
$3.23M
@ $54.03 · 2026-02-11
MILLS ROBERT D.
Chief Technology Officer
$3.41M
@ $54.12 · 2026-02-11
BARTON KURT D.
Chief Financial Officer
$101,378
@ $53.81 · 2026-02-10
BARTON KURT D.
Chief Financial Officer
$104,050
@ $53.94 · 2026-02-06
LAWTON HARRY A III
Chief Executive Officer
$4.50M
@ $53.16 · 2026-02-03
KERSEY MELISSA
Officer
$377,426
@ $59.79 · 2025-08-13
WEIKEL MARK J
Director
$479,360
@ $59.92 · 2025-08-07
YANKEE COLIN
Officer
$390,121
@ $58.40 · 2025-07-28
BARTON KURT D.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.76M
@ $63.96 · 2025-07-24
ELLISON-SOUTHALL NONI L
General Counsel
$332,592
@ $63.96 · 2025-07-24
JACKSON DENISE L
Director
$68,152
@ $58.50 · 2025-07-22
JACKSON DENISE L
Director
$115,500
@ $57.75 · 2025-07-10
JACKSON DENISE L
Director
$57,000
@ $57.00 · 2025-07-09
ESTEP JONATHAN S
Officer
$2.01M
@ $56.00 · 2025-07-07
JACKSON DENISE L
Director
$258,965
@ $55.93 · 2025-07-07
JACKSON DENISE L
Director
$85,250
@ $55.00 · 2025-07-02
ESTEP JONATHAN S
Officer
$3.00M
@ $53.00 · 2025-06-23
RUBIN MATTHEW LAWRENCE
President
$145,446
@ $51.76 · 2025-05-14
RUBIN MATTHEW LAWRENCE
Officer
$222,091
@ $57.69 · 2025-02-20
BARTON KURT D.
Chief Financial Officer
$680,176
@ $56.00 · 2025-02-13
YANKEE COLIN
Officer
$1.33M
@ $54.15 · 2025-02-11
KERSEY MELISSA
Officer
$494,472
@ $53.17 · 2025-02-06
LAWTON HARRY A III
Chief Executive Officer
$4.81M
@ $54.59 · 2025-02-03
BARTON KURT D.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.96M
@ $295.64 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TSCO
FearGreed
😨Fear(31/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
TSCO
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
View BAC Full AnalysisView TSCO Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs TSCO

Is Bank of America Corporation or Tractor Supply Company more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to TSCO's -15.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $29 vs. $33).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Tractor Supply Company?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while TSCO scores 86/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TSCO scores 4.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Tractor Supply Company?

TSCO earns 16.4% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Tractor Supply Company's?

TSCO's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). TSCO has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs TSCO: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io