SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › BAC vs TROW

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. TROW is undervalued at $103, with an intrinsic value of $187 and a margin of safety of 45%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.64
VS
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
$103.22

Rewards

BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
TROW
  • ★T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. scores 83/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.95 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
TROW
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.51 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 11.3% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
TROW
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$2.02B
N/A
FCF Yield
9.19%
13.31
Trailing P/E
10.36
10.89
Forward P/E
10.00
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
13.63%
11.20%
ROE
19.40%
0.00%
Gross Margin
51.61%
0.90
PEG Ratio
2.51
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.94
2.21%
Dividend Yield
5.08%
BAC: 1Ties: 1TROW: 6
BACTROW

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TROW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TROW
$-0.81
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.58B
Δ Market Cap
$-2.09B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.64
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TROW
44.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 44.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $103.22
Fair Value: $186.61
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

TROW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $103?

-5.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -2.6%

The market implies -5.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TROW
83/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TROW
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TROW
Insiders 1.7%Institutions 91.7%Retail & Other 6.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,550
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TROW
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TROW
1
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.18M
NELSON JOSHUA B.
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.82 · 2026-08-25
JACKSON STEPHON A.
Officer
$307,680
@ $102.56 · 2026-05-13
HUSAIN ARIF
Vice President
$434,336
@ $101.96 · 2025-12-10
MACLELLAN ROBERT FRANCIS
Director
$324,466
@ $105.01 · 2025-09-22
SAWYER DOROTHY C
Vice President
$190,860
@ $95.43 · 2025-06-11
HIEBLER JESSICA M
Officer
$93,879
@ $96.98 · 2025-05-12
MACLELLAN ROBERT FRANCIS
Director
$362,120
@ $91.56 · 2025-03-31
HIEBLER JESSICA M
Officer
$126,965
@ $107.87 · 2025-02-14
HUSAIN ARIF
Vice President
$449,318
@ $109.27 · 2025-02-11
THOMSON ANDREW JUSTIN MACKENZIE
Officer
$499,184
@ $123.35 · 2024-12-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TROW
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
TROW
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
View BAC Full AnalysisView TROW Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs TROW

Is Bank of America Corporation or T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to TROW's 44.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $187 vs. $103).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.?▼

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while TROW scores 83/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TROW scores 8.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.?▼

TROW earns 13.6% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.'s?▼

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to TROW's 69/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.