Compare Stocks › BAC vs TEL

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs TE Connectivity plc (TEL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BAC is undervalued at $50, with a DCF intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. TEL is overvalued at $213, with an intrinsic value of $156 and a margin of safety of -37%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01
VS
TEL
TE Connectivity plc
$213.03

Rewards

BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
TEL
  • ★TE Connectivity plc has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★TE Connectivity plc scores 81/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 23.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
TEL
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠12 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
TEL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$3.20B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.23%
11.94
Trailing P/E
19.24
9.64
Forward P/E
14.09
Quality & Moat
3.80%
ROIC
17.09%
10.73%
ROE
24.61%
0.00%
Gross Margin
36.24%
0.91
PEG Ratio
1.23
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.29
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.76
2.56%
Dividend Yield
1.46%
BAC: 4Ties: 1TEL: 3
BACTEL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TEL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TEL
$6.55
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.66B
Δ Market Cap
+$30.50B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
72.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $50.01
Fair Value: $180.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TEL
36.5% Overvalued
Price is 36.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $213.03
Fair Value: $156.05
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

TEL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $213?

+15.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.0%

The market implies +15.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TEL
81/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TEL
-2.87
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,517
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TEL
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 99.3%Retail & Other 0.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,858
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TEL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TEL
0
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $52.50M
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$2.02M
@ $215.00 · 2026-06-01
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$2.02M
@ $215.00 · 2026-05-06
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$2.10M
@ $223.26 · 2026-04-08
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$2.09M
@ $222.52 · 2026-03-02
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$1.53M
@ $233.64 · 2026-02-13
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$2.20M
@ $233.82 · 2026-02-13
SHAFFER REUBEN M
Officer
$333,853
@ $234.28 · 2026-02-13
JENKINS JOHN S.
General Counsel
$1.37M
@ $222.81 · 2026-02-09
CURTIN TERRENCE R
Chief Executive Officer
$9.45M
@ $227.07 · 2025-12-19
MITTS HEATH A
Chief Financial Officer
$2.84M
@ $226.43 · 2025-12-19
JENKINS JOHN S.
General Counsel
$6.20M
@ $247.73 · 2025-11-03
MITTS HEATH A
Chief Financial Officer
$20.34M
@ $247.15 · 2025-11-03
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$4.84M
@ $202.99 · 2025-09-02
SAGAR MALAVIKA
Officer
$403,004
@ $207.20 · 2025-07-28
JENKINS JOHN S.
General Counsel
$9.60M
@ $209.33 · 2025-07-28
CURTIN TERRENCE R
Chief Executive Officer
$41.15M
@ $208.76 · 2025-07-28
STUCKI AARON KYLE
Officer
$10.20M
@ $192.78 · 2025-07-23
STUCKI AARON KYLE
Officer
$2.23M
@ $170.00 · 2025-06-26
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$3.98M
@ $159.03 · 2025-06-02
JENKINS JOHN S.
General Counsel
$3.32M
@ $162.85 · 2025-05-13
STUCKI AARON KYLE
President
$800,000
@ $160.00 · 2025-05-12
SAGAR MALAVIKA
Officer
$500,000
@ $160.00 · 2025-05-12
MITTS HEATH A
Chief Financial Officer
$8.49M
@ $159.21 · 2025-05-12
MITTS HEATH A
Chief Financial Officer
$5.80M
@ $153.33 · 2025-05-09
JENKINS JOHN S.
General Counsel
$4.48M
@ $149.39 · 2025-05-02
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$3.67M
@ $146.77 · 2025-03-04
WRIGHT LAURA H
Director
$154,660
@ $154.66 · 2025-02-18
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$587,706
@ $151.16 · 2025-01-27
CURTIN TERRENCE R
Chief Executive Officer
$17.79M
@ $154.69 · 2024-11-11
JENKINS JOHN S.
General Counsel
$6.34M
@ $155.49 · 2024-11-07
OTT ROBERT J
Officer
$2.50M
@ $155.41 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TEL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
TEL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
View BAC Full AnalysisView TEL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs TEL

Is Bank of America Corporation or TE Connectivity plc more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to TEL's -36.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $156 vs. $213).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or TE Connectivity plc?▼

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while TEL scores 81/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TEL scores 5.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or TE Connectivity plc?▼

TEL earns 17.1% ROIC versus BAC's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or TE Connectivity plc's?▼

TEL's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). TEL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.