Compare StocksBAC vs TDY

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. TDY is overvalued at $606, with an intrinsic value of $495 and a margin of safety of -23%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.63
VS
TDY
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
$606.24

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
TDY
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 39.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.36 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
TDY
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.37 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • Insiders have sold $4.7M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
TDY
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$912.68M
N/A
FCF Yield
3.25%
13.31
Trailing P/E
29.32
10.89
Forward P/E
22.65
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
7.86%
11.20%
ROE
9.15%
0.00%
Gross Margin
43.34%
0.90
PEG Ratio
1.40
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.15
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.06
2.21%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
BAC: 5Ties: 1TDY: 2
BACTDY

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TDY

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TDY
$1.86
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.60B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.63
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TDY
22.5% Overvalued
Price is 22.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $606.24
Fair Value: $494.82
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

TDY

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $606?

+11.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.4%

The market implies +11.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TDY
64/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TDY
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TDY
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 100.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,226
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TDY
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TDY
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.19M
VON SCHACK WESLEY W
Director
$321,343
@ $686.63 · 2026-08-12
LORNE SIMON M
Director
$4.39M
@ $680.34 · 2026-08-12
SMITH MICHAEL T.
Director
$2.48M
@ $621.00 · 2026-01-29
BOBB GEORGE C. III
Chief Executive Officer
$3.74M
@ $555.41 · 2025-07-30
SMITH MICHAEL T.
Director
$1.11M
@ $560.10 · 2025-07-28
LORNE SIMON M
Director
$3.47M
@ $549.64 · 2025-07-25
CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
General Counsel
$367,090
@ $519.96 · 2025-03-03
VANWEES JASON
Officer
$1.92M
@ $520.06 · 2025-03-03
MEHRABIAN ROBERT
Officer and Director
$16.15M
@ $512.21 · 2025-02-07
MEHRABIAN ROBERT
Officer and Director
$2.99M
@ $518.22 · 2025-01-31
CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
General Counsel
$1.38M
@ $510.03 · 2025-01-29
CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
Chief Operating Officer
$3.78M
@ $511.10 · 2025-01-28
SMITH MICHAEL T.
Director
$1.07M
@ $510.50 · 2025-01-27
BOBB GEORGE C. III
President
$3.20M
@ $507.77 · 2025-01-24
BELAK CYNTHIA Y.
Officer
$2.92M
@ $508.34 · 2025-01-24
BLACKWOOD STEPHEN FINIS
Chief Financial Officer
$2.59M
@ $513.62 · 2025-01-24
SMITH MICHAEL T.
Director
$968,456
@ $478.25 · 2024-12-12
CROCKER CHARLES
Director
$946,236
@ $473.12 · 2024-12-09
MEHRABIAN ROBERT
Officer and Director
$24.38M
@ $487.58 · 2024-11-11
CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
General Counsel
$4.64M
@ $490.17 · 2024-11-08
VANWEES JASON
Officer
$2.45M
@ $489.42 · 2024-11-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TDY
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
TDY
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
View BAC Full AnalysisView TDY Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs TDY

Is Bank of America Corporation or Teledyne Technologies Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to TDY's -22.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $495 vs. $606).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Teledyne Technologies Incorporated?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while TDY scores 64/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TDY scores 4.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Teledyne Technologies Incorporated?

TDY earns 7.9% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

BAC vs TDY: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io