Compare Stocks › BAC vs TDY

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BAC is undervalued at $50, with a DCF intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. TDY is overvalued at $658, with an intrinsic value of $502 and a margin of safety of -31%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01
VS
TDY
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
$658.23

Rewards

BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
TDY
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 39.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 4.36 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
TDY
  • ⚠Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.37 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $4.7M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
TDY
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$953.88M
N/A
FCF Yield
3.13%
11.94
Trailing P/E
30.14
9.64
Forward P/E
23.80
Quality & Moat
3.80%
ROIC
8.12%
10.73%
ROE
9.47%
0.00%
Gross Margin
43.60%
0.91
PEG Ratio
1.40
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.13
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.88
2.56%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
BAC: 5Ties: 1TDY: 2
BACTDY

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TDY

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TDY
$1.86
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.60B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
72.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $50.01
Fair Value: $180.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TDY
31.1% Overvalued
Price is 31.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $658.23
Fair Value: $502.09
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

TDY

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $658?

+12.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.7%

The market implies +12.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TDY
64/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TDY
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,517
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TDY
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 102.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,226
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TDY
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TDY
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.19M
VON SCHACK WESLEY W
Director
$321,343
@ $686.63 · 2026-08-12
LORNE SIMON M
Director
$4.39M
@ $680.34 · 2026-08-12
SMITH MICHAEL T.
Director
$2.48M
@ $621.00 · 2026-01-29
BOBB GEORGE C. III
Chief Executive Officer
$3.74M
@ $555.41 · 2025-07-30
SMITH MICHAEL T.
Director
$1.11M
@ $560.10 · 2025-07-28
LORNE SIMON M
Director
$3.47M
@ $549.64 · 2025-07-25
VANWEES JASON
Officer
$1.92M
@ $520.06 · 2025-03-03
CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
General Counsel
$367,090
@ $519.96 · 2025-03-03
MEHRABIAN ROBERT
Officer and Director
$16.15M
@ $512.21 · 2025-02-07
MEHRABIAN ROBERT
Officer and Director
$2.99M
@ $518.22 · 2025-01-31
CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
General Counsel
$1.38M
@ $510.03 · 2025-01-29
CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
Chief Operating Officer
$3.78M
@ $511.10 · 2025-01-28
SMITH MICHAEL T.
Director
$1.07M
@ $510.50 · 2025-01-27
BLACKWOOD STEPHEN FINIS
Chief Financial Officer
$2.59M
@ $513.62 · 2025-01-24
BOBB GEORGE C. III
President
$3.20M
@ $507.77 · 2025-01-24
BELAK CYNTHIA Y.
Officer
$2.92M
@ $508.34 · 2025-01-24
SMITH MICHAEL T.
Director
$968,456
@ $478.25 · 2024-12-12
CROCKER CHARLES
Director
$946,236
@ $473.12 · 2024-12-09
MEHRABIAN ROBERT
Officer and Director
$24.38M
@ $487.58 · 2024-11-11
VANWEES JASON
Officer
$2.45M
@ $489.42 · 2024-11-08
CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
General Counsel
$4.64M
@ $490.17 · 2024-11-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TDY
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
TDY
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
View BAC Full AnalysisView TDY Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs TDY

Is Bank of America Corporation or Teledyne Technologies Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to TDY's -31.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $502 vs. $658).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Teledyne Technologies Incorporated?▼

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while TDY scores 64/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TDY scores 4.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Teledyne Technologies Incorporated?▼

TDY earns 8.1% ROIC versus BAC's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

BAC vs TDY: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io