Compare StocksBAC vs SWKS

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. SWKS is undervalued at $72, with an intrinsic value of $120 and a margin of safety of 39%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
SWKS
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
$72.45

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
SWKS
  • FCF yield of 9.9% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.62 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -0.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
SWKS
  • ROIC has declined by 10.2 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Trailing P/E of 30.2x is 63% above the historical average of 18.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
SWKS
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.08B
N/A
FCF Yield
9.87%
13.95
Trailing P/E
30.19
11.13
Forward P/E
14.08
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
3.54%
10.64%
ROE
6.17%
0.00%
Gross Margin
41.08%
1.02
PEG Ratio
1.54
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.26
1.97%
Dividend Yield
3.98%
BAC: 5Ties: 1SWKS: 2
BACSWKS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SWKS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SWKS
$-6.64
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$779.0M
Δ Market Cap
$-5.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SWKS
6.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 6.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $72.45
Fair Value: $77.42
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

SWKS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $72?

+3.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -2.0%

The market implies +3.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -2.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SWKS
48/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SWKS
-2.85
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SWKS
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 114.6%
No. of Institutional Holders964
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SWKS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BRACE PHILIP GORDON
Chief Executive Officer
$661,300
@ $66.13 · 2025-02-25
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SWKS
0
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $764,501
KASNAVI REZA
Chief Technology Officer
$456,519
@ $62.26 · 2025-11-19
TERRY ROBERT JOHN
General Counsel
$307,982
@ $62.28 · 2025-11-19
TERRY ROBERT JOHN
General Counsel
$1.09M
@ $87.83 · 2024-11-12
KASNAVI REZA
Officer
$269,080
@ $87.96 · 2024-11-11
KASNAVI REZA
Officer
$1.07M
@ $89.84 · 2024-11-08
TERRY ROBERT JOHN
General Counsel
$164,181
@ $90.16 · 2024-11-08
BORI CARLOS S
Officer
$993,616
@ $97.63 · 2024-10-14
BORI CARLOS S
Officer
$950,462
@ $101.97 · 2024-09-13
KASNAVI REZA
Officer
$198,067
@ $107.47 · 2024-08-16
CARTER PHILIP MATTHEW
Officer
$54,240
@ $120.00 · 2024-07-16
CARTER PHILIP MATTHEW
Officer
$49,720
@ $110.00 · 2024-07-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SWKS
FearGreed
😨Fear(36/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
SWKS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
View BAC Full AnalysisView SWKS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs SWKS

Is Bank of America Corporation or Skyworks Solutions, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to SWKS's 39.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $120 vs. $72).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Skyworks Solutions, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while SWKS scores 48/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. SWKS scores 4.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Skyworks Solutions, Inc.?

BAC earns 3.9% ROIC versus SWKS's 3.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Skyworks Solutions, Inc.'s?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to SWKS's 64/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.