Compare StocksBAC vs SPG

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. SPG is overvalued at $211, with an intrinsic value of $165 and a margin of safety of -28%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
SPG
Simon Property Group, Inc.
$211.33

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
SPG
  • Gross margin of 81.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Simon Property Group, Inc. scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
SPG
  • PEG ratio of 4.58 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • High leverage (4.49x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.8x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
SPG
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$2.49B
N/A
FCF Yield
3.11%
13.95
Trailing P/E
14.70
11.13
Forward P/E
31.51
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
6.45%
10.64%
ROE
113.59%
0.00%
Gross Margin
81.58%
1.02
PEG Ratio
4.58
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
4.49
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.79
1.97%
Dividend Yield
4.09%
BAC: 3Ties: 1SPG: 4
BACSPG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SPG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SPG
$106.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$205.6M
Δ Market Cap
+$21.79B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SPG
28.3% Overvalued
Price is 28.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $211.33
Fair Value: $164.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

SPG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $211?

+8.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +18.3%

The market implies +8.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +18.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SPG
74/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SPG
-2.24
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SPG
Insiders 1.8%Institutions 95.1%Retail & Other 3.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,811
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SPG
10
Buys (3M)
23
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $988,547
LEWIS RANDALL J.
Director
$10,293
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
SMITH DANIEL C.
Director
$65,249
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
AEPPEL GLYN F
Director
$40,620
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
STEWART MARTA R
Director
$36,025
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
SELIG STEFAN M
Director
$37,863
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
ROE PEGGY FANG
Director
$14,888
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
JONES NINA P.
Director
$6,617
@ $183.81 · 2026-03-31
RODKIN GARY M
Director
$42,642
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S
Director
$90,246
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
GLASSCOCK LARRY C
Director
$68,557
@ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
LEWIS RANDALL J.
Director
$100,258
@ $183.96 · 2025-12-15
LEWIS RANDALL J.
Director
$106,310
@ $180.80 · 2025-11-18
AEPPEL GLYN F
Director
$38,678
@ $185.95 · 2025-09-30
SELIG STEFAN M
Director
$36,260
@ $185.95 · 2025-09-30
ROE PEGGY FANG
Director
$14,132
@ $185.95 · 2025-09-30
STEWART MARTA R
Director
$7,205
@ $171.55 · 2025-08-14
SMITH DANIEL C.
Director
$60,212
@ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
AEPPEL GLYN F
Director
$37,274
@ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
STEWART MARTA R
Director
$33,132
@ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
ROE PEGGY FANG
Director
$13,699
@ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
JONES NINA P.
Director
$6,053
@ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
RODKIN GARY M
Director
$39,185
@ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S
Director
$83,149
@ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S
Director
$79,434
@ $164.80 · 2025-03-31
SMITH DANIEL C.
Director
$54,372
@ $167.30 · 2024-09-30
AEPPEL GLYN F
Director
$32,791
@ $167.30 · 2024-09-30
SELIG STEFAN M
Director
$30,449
@ $167.30 · 2024-09-30
JONES NINA P.
Director
$3,346
@ $167.30 · 2024-09-30
HUBBARD ALLAN B
Director
$61,901
@ $167.30 · 2024-09-30
LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S
Director
$75,787
@ $167.30 · 2024-09-30
GLASSCOCK LARRY C
Director
$56,547
@ $167.30 · 2024-09-30
SMITH DANIEL C.
Director
$52,259
@ $150.17 · 2024-06-28
SELIG STEFAN M
Director
$29,283
@ $150.17 · 2024-06-28
RODKIN GARY M
Director
$33,488
@ $150.17 · 2024-06-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SPG
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.01M
RULLI JOHN
Officer
$2.01M
@ $200.88 · 2026-02-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SPG
FearGreed
😏Greed(68/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
SPG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
View BAC Full AnalysisView SPG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs SPG

Is Bank of America Corporation or Simon Property Group, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to SPG's -28.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $165 vs. $211).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Simon Property Group, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while SPG scores 74/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. SPG scores 1.3 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Simon Property Group, Inc.?

SPG earns 6.4% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Simon Property Group, Inc.'s?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to SPG's 54/100 (Borderline). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs SPG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io