Compare StocksBAC vs RVTY

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Revvity, Inc. (RVTY): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. RVTY is fairly valued at $100, with an intrinsic value of $113 and a margin of safety of 11%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
RVTY
Revvity, Inc.
$100.00

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
RVTY
  • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • PEG ratio of 0.61 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
RVTY
  • Trailing P/E of 48.1x is 33% above the historical average of 36.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.0% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
RVTY
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$508.97M
N/A
FCF Yield
4.56%
13.95
Trailing P/E
48.08
11.13
Forward P/E
17.15
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
2.69%
10.64%
ROE
3.23%
0.00%
Gross Margin
54.32%
1.00
PEG Ratio
0.61
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.35
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.91
1.99%
Dividend Yield
0.28%
BAC: 5Ties: 1RVTY: 2
BACRVTY

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

RVTY

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
RVTY
$-6.21
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.10B
Δ Market Cap
$-6.85B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
RVTY
11.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 11.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $100.00
Fair Value: $112.57
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

RVTY

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $100?

+10.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.7%

The market implies +10.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
RVTY
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
RVTY
-2.44
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
RVTY
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 105.8%
No. of Institutional Holders732
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
RVTY
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
RVTY
1
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.68M
GONZALES ANITA
Officer
$7,424
@ $92.80 · 2026-04-20
VICTOR MIRIAME
Officer
$180,856
@ $97.13 · 2026-02-24
MCMURRY-HEATH MICHELLE
Director
$58,356
@ $97.26 · 2026-02-23
GOLDBERG JOEL S
General Counsel
$1.27M
@ $100.21 · 2026-02-05
SINGH PRAHLAD R
Chief Executive Officer
$2.56M
@ $100.21 · 2026-02-05
VOHRA TAJINDER S
Officer
$601,502
@ $104.50 · 2026-02-02
MCMURRY-HEATH MICHELLE
Director
$55,299
@ $92.17 · 2025-05-29
MCMURRY-HEATH MICHELLE
Director
$235,395
@ $119.49 · 2025-02-06
GOLDBERG JOEL S
Officer
$1.92M
@ $126.73 · 2025-01-30
VOHRA TAJINDER S
Officer
$641,543
@ $116.81 · 2025-01-07
SINGH PRAHLAD R
Chief Executive Officer
$2.13M
@ $116.22 · 2024-12-02
VOHRA TAJINDER S
Officer
$262,202
@ $121.73 · 2024-10-09
VOHRA TAJINDER S
Officer
$526,910
@ $122.34 · 2024-10-08
GOLDBERG JOEL S
General Counsel
$412,507
@ $117.86 · 2024-08-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
RVTY
FearGreed
😐Neutral(42/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
RVTY
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (42)
View BAC Full AnalysisView RVTY Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs RVTY

Is Bank of America Corporation or Revvity, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to RVTY's 11.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $113 vs. $100).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Revvity, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while RVTY scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. RVTY scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Revvity, Inc.?

BAC earns 3.9% ROIC versus RVTY's 2.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Revvity, Inc.'s?

RVTY's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). RVTY has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.