Compare StocksBAC vs ROL

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Rollins, Inc. (ROL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. ROL is overvalued at $45, with an intrinsic value of $34 and a margin of safety of -33%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
$44.96

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
ROL
  • Rollins, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Rollins, Inc. scores 98/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 14.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
ROL
  • FCF yield of 2.4% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • PEG ratio of 3.37 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 18 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
ROL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$521.45M
N/A
FCF Yield
2.41%
13.95
Trailing P/E
41.25
11.13
Forward P/E
32.22
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
19.91%
10.64%
ROE
38.67%
0.00%
Gross Margin
52.60%
1.02
PEG Ratio
3.37
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.69
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.11
1.97%
Dividend Yield
1.54%
BAC: 4Ties: 1ROL: 3
BACROL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ROL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ROL
$20.24
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$537.8M
Δ Market Cap
+$10.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ROL
33.4% Overvalued
Price is 33.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $44.96
Fair Value: $33.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

ROL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $45?

+15.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +18.2%

The market implies +15.8% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +18.2%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ROL
98/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ROL
-2.71
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ROL
Insiders 38.4%Institutions 61.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,198
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ROL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ROL
0
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.11B
CHANDLER ELIZABETH B
General Counsel
$842,971
@ $59.36 · 2026-02-25
GAHLHOFF JERRY JR
Chief Executive Officer
$82,119
@ $62.83 · 2026-01-28
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$20,294
@ $62.83 · 2026-01-28
ROLLINS GARY W
Officer, Director and Beneficial Owner
$650,605
@ $62.83 · 2026-01-28
CHANDLER ELIZABETH B
General Counsel
$83,501
@ $62.83 · 2026-01-28
WILSON JOHN F
Officer and Director
$335,764
@ $62.83 · 2026-01-28
GAHLHOFF JERRY JR
Chief Executive Officer
$285,303
@ $63.26 · 2026-01-26
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$56,112
@ $63.26 · 2026-01-26
ROLLINS GARY W
Officer, Director and Beneficial Owner
$1.21M
@ $63.26 · 2026-01-26
CHANDLER ELIZABETH B
General Counsel
$136,072
@ $63.26 · 2026-01-26
WILSON JOHN F
Officer and Director
$476,854
@ $63.26 · 2026-01-26
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$143,904
@ $60.06 · 2026-01-09
WILSON JOHN F
Officer and Director
$90,288
@ $59.40 · 2025-12-15
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$143,113
@ $59.73 · 2025-12-12
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$138,359
@ $57.77 · 2025-11-14
LOR INC
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$1.10B
@ $56.93 · 2025-11-10
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$57,130
@ $57.13 · 2025-08-20
WILSON JOHN F
Officer and Director
$1.74M
@ $58.04 · 2025-07-24
GAHLHOFF JERRY JR
Chief Executive Officer
$854,700
@ $56.98 · 2025-06-11
WILSON JOHN F
Officer and Director
$2.27M
@ $56.77 · 2025-05-29
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$108,613
@ $56.54 · 2025-05-09
TESH THOMAS D
Officer
$99,469
@ $51.78 · 2025-03-10
HORNFECK TRACI
Officer
$171,194
@ $53.10 · 2025-03-04
CHANDLER ELIZABETH B
General Counsel
$675,218
@ $51.18 · 2025-02-21
CHANDLER ELIZABETH B
Officer
$236,546
@ $50.49 · 2024-10-01
CHANDLER ELIZABETH B
Officer
$237,717
@ $50.74 · 2024-09-03
CHANDLER ELIZABETH B
Officer
$224,085
@ $47.82 · 2024-08-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ROL
FearGreed
😨Fear(33/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
ROL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
View BAC Full AnalysisView ROL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs ROL

Is Bank of America Corporation or Rollins, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to ROL's -33.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $34 vs. $45).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Rollins, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while ROL scores 98/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ROL scores 12.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Rollins, Inc.?

ROL earns 19.9% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Rollins, Inc.'s?

ROL's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). ROL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs ROL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io