Compare StocksBAC vs RJF

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. RJF is undervalued at $163, with an intrinsic value of $463 and a margin of safety of 65%. Of the two, RJF has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.71
VS
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
$163.02

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
RJF
  • Gross margin of 93.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Raymond James Financial, Inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.34 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
RJF
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.62 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $4.1M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
RJF
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
N/A
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
13.33
Trailing P/E
14.21
10.91
Forward P/E
11.48
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
12.32%
11.20%
ROE
18.42%
0.00%
Gross Margin
93.16%
0.90
PEG Ratio
0.84
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
2.21%
Dividend Yield
1.31%
BAC: 3Ties: 1RJF: 4
BACRJF

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

RJF

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
RJF
$1.84
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.79B
Δ Market Cap
+$8.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.71
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
RJF
64.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 64.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $163.02
Fair Value: $462.82
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

RJF

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
RJF
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
RJF
-2.56
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
RJF
Insiders 10.6%Institutions 81.1%Retail & Other 8.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,263
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
RJF
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
RJF
3
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $30.39M
ALLAIRE BELLA LOYKHTER
Officer
$1.33M
@ $177.60 · 2026-08-28
ELWYN TASHTEGO S
Officer
$1.76M
@ $176.06 · 2026-07-28
RANEY STEVEN M
Officer
$998,033
@ $172.97 · 2026-07-27
ALLAIRE BELLA LOYKHTER
Officer
$4.21M
@ $142.34 · 2026-03-19
SANTELLI JONATHAN N
General Counsel
$767,079
@ $170.46 · 2026-02-04
REILLY PAUL C
Officer and Director
$21.32M
@ $163.15 · 2025-12-15
ALLAIRE BELLA LOYKHTER
Officer
$963,228
@ $146.61 · 2025-05-29
BUNN JAMES E.
Officer
$498,184
@ $136.49 · 2025-04-28
SANTELLI JONATHAN N
General Counsel
$699,932
@ $168.25 · 2025-01-31
ELWYN TASHTEGO S
Officer
$1.59M
@ $159.47 · 2024-12-13
SANTELLI JONATHAN N
General Counsel
$513,318
@ $165.59 · 2024-12-05
CARTER HORACE
Officer
$825,147
@ $165.03 · 2024-12-04
REID SHANNON B
Officer
$205,141
@ $165.30 · 2024-12-04
LARSON KATHERINE H.
Officer
$247,691
@ $166.01 · 2024-12-03
ALLAIRE BELLA LOYKHTER
Officer
$769,791
@ $166.59 · 2024-12-03
RANEY STEVEN M
Officer
$2.34M
@ $169.02 · 2024-12-02
REILLY PAUL C
Chief Executive Officer
$8.37M
@ $167.30 · 2024-12-02
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
RJF
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
RJF
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View BAC Full AnalysisView RJF Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs RJF

Is Bank of America Corporation or Raymond James Financial, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, RJF trades at a 64.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $463 vs. price $163), compared to BAC's 59.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $142 vs. $58).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Raymond James Financial, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while RJF scores 93/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. RJF scores 0.6 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Raymond James Financial, Inc.?

RJF earns 12.3% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s?

RJF's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). RJF has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs RJF: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io