Compare StocksBAC vs RCL

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. RCL is undervalued at $313, with an intrinsic value of $458 and a margin of safety of 32%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
RCL
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
$312.51

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
RCL
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $9.02 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
RCL
  • High leverage (2.12x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • 11 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
RCL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-194.88M
N/A
FCF Yield
-0.23%
13.95
Trailing P/E
19.07
11.13
Forward P/E
15.61
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
11.95%
10.64%
ROE
49.58%
0.00%
Gross Margin
50.91%
1.02
PEG Ratio
1.48
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
2.12
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.08
1.97%
Dividend Yield
1.60%
BAC: 4Ties: 1RCL: 3
BACRCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

RCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
RCL
$7.94
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$7.91B
Δ Market Cap
+$62.81B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
RCL
31.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $312.51
Fair Value: $457.80
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

RCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
RCL
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
RCL
-2.85
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
RCL
Insiders 1.8%Institutions 90.3%Retail & Other 7.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,623
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
RCL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HOLTZ NAFTALI
Chief Financial Officer
$749,000
@ $140.00 · 2024-08-02
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
RCL
0
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $88.33M
MONTIEL MARITZA GOMEZ
Director
$453,137
@ $327.17 · 2026-02-17
BETHGE LAURA H
Officer
$2.56M
@ $326.21 · 2026-02-17
PUJOL HENRY L
Officer
$1.46M
@ $327.99 · 2026-02-13
BAYLEY MICHAEL W
Officer
$26.15M
@ $326.82 · 2026-02-13
LIBERTY JASON T
Chief Executive Officer
$29.71M
@ $326.81 · 2026-02-13
HOLTZ NAFTALI
Chief Financial Officer
$16.74M
@ $327.39 · 2026-02-13
MONTIEL MARITZA GOMEZ
Director
$309,936
@ $281.76 · 2025-11-03
SORENSEN VAGN O
Director
$3.40M
@ $330.04 · 2025-08-19
FAIN RICHARD DAVID
Director
$4.98M
@ $311.02 · 2025-08-06
PUJOL HENRY L
Officer
$1.72M
@ $329.47 · 2025-07-30
LAKE ROBERT ALEXANDER
Officer
$860,270
@ $299.85 · 2025-06-27
LAKE ROBERT ALEXANDER
Officer
$687,500
@ $275.00 · 2025-06-06
FAIN RICHARD DAVID
Director
$4.96M
@ $253.10 · 2025-05-19
MONTIEL MARITZA GOMEZ
Director
$363,735
@ $242.49 · 2025-05-12
BAYLEY MICHAEL W
Officer
$12.88M
@ $262.07 · 2025-02-18
LIBERTY JASON T
Chief Executive Officer
$15.19M
@ $261.95 · 2025-02-18
HOLTZ NAFTALI
Chief Financial Officer
$4.45M
@ $261.62 · 2025-02-18
BETHGE LAURA H
Officer
$3.93M
@ $261.86 · 2025-02-18
FAIN RICHARD DAVID
Director
$5.01M
@ $256.68 · 2025-02-13
KULOVAARA HARRI U
Officer
$763,923
@ $234.62 · 2024-11-20
KULOVAARA HARRI U
Officer
$4.06M
@ $209.58 · 2024-11-05
PUJOL HENRY L
Officer
$1.40M
@ $208.51 · 2024-10-30
BETHGE LAURA H
Officer
$518,446
@ $168.71 · 2024-08-29
SORENSEN VAGN O
Director
$919,300
@ $158.50 · 2024-08-15
FAIN RICHARD DAVID
Director
$3.02M
@ $156.25 · 2024-07-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
RCL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
RCL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
View BAC Full AnalysisView RCL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs RCL

Is Bank of America Corporation or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to RCL's 31.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $458 vs. $313).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while RCL scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. RCL scores 2.2 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.?

RCL earns 11.9% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.'s?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to RCL's 73/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs RCL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io