Compare Stocks › BAC vs RCL

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BAC is undervalued at $50, with a DCF intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. RCL is undervalued at $307, with an intrinsic value of $413 and a margin of safety of 26%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01
VS
RCL
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
$307.18

Rewards

BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
RCL
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $9.02 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
RCL
  • ⚠High leverage (1.87x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • ⚠8 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
RCL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-50.00M
N/A
FCF Yield
-0.06%
11.94
Trailing P/E
18.18
9.64
Forward P/E
15.03
Quality & Moat
3.80%
ROIC
14.48%
10.73%
ROE
41.29%
0.00%
Gross Margin
50.25%
0.91
PEG Ratio
1.24
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
1.87
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.12
2.56%
Dividend Yield
1.95%
BAC: 4Ties: 1RCL: 3
BACRCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

RCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
RCL
$7.94
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$7.91B
Δ Market Cap
+$62.81B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
72.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $50.01
Fair Value: $180.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
RCL
25.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 25.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $307.18
Fair Value: $413.44
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

RCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
RCL
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
RCL
-2.85
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,517
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
RCL
Insiders 6.2%Institutions 84.4%Retail & Other 9.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,668
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
RCL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
RCL
0
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $81.43M
BAYLEY MICHAEL W
Officer
$4.05M
@ $315.99 · 2026-07-29
MONTIEL MARITZA GOMEZ
Director
$453,137
@ $327.17 · 2026-02-17
BETHGE LAURA H
Officer
$2.56M
@ $326.21 · 2026-02-17
LIBERTY JASON T
Chief Executive Officer
$29.71M
@ $326.81 · 2026-02-13
HOLTZ NAFTALI
Chief Financial Officer
$16.74M
@ $327.39 · 2026-02-13
PUJOL HENRY L
Officer
$1.46M
@ $327.99 · 2026-02-13
BAYLEY MICHAEL W
Officer
$26.15M
@ $326.82 · 2026-02-13
MONTIEL MARITZA GOMEZ
Director
$309,936
@ $281.76 · 2025-11-03
SORENSEN VAGN O
Director
$3.40M
@ $330.04 · 2025-08-19
FAIN RICHARD DAVID
Director
$4.98M
@ $311.02 · 2025-08-06
PUJOL HENRY L
Officer
$1.72M
@ $329.47 · 2025-07-30
LAKE ROBERT ALEXANDER
Officer
$860,270
@ $299.85 · 2025-06-27
LAKE ROBERT ALEXANDER
Officer
$687,500
@ $275.00 · 2025-06-06
FAIN RICHARD DAVID
Director
$4.96M
@ $253.10 · 2025-05-19
MONTIEL MARITZA GOMEZ
Director
$363,735
@ $242.49 · 2025-05-12
LIBERTY JASON T
Chief Executive Officer
$15.19M
@ $261.95 · 2025-02-18
HOLTZ NAFTALI
Chief Financial Officer
$4.45M
@ $261.62 · 2025-02-18
BETHGE LAURA H
Officer
$3.93M
@ $261.86 · 2025-02-18
BAYLEY MICHAEL W
Officer
$12.88M
@ $262.07 · 2025-02-18
FAIN RICHARD DAVID
Director
$5.01M
@ $256.68 · 2025-02-13
KULOVAARA HARRI U
Officer
$763,923
@ $234.62 · 2024-11-20
KULOVAARA HARRI U
Officer
$4.06M
@ $209.58 · 2024-11-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
RCL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
RCL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
View BAC Full AnalysisView RCL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs RCL

Is Bank of America Corporation or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to RCL's 25.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $413 vs. $307).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.?▼

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while RCL scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. RCL scores 2.2 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.?▼

RCL earns 14.5% ROIC versus BAC's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.'s?▼

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to RCL's 73/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs RCL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io