Compare StocksBAC vs Q

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. Q is fairly valued at $118, with an intrinsic value of $132 and a margin of safety of 10%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.59
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$118.37

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
Q

    Risks

    BAC
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    Q

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      BAC
      Q
      Valuation
      N/A
      Free Cash Flow
      $772.25M
      N/A
      FCF Yield
      3.12%
      13.30
      Trailing P/E
      42.28
      10.88
      Forward P/E
      22.01
      Quality & Moat
      4.37%
      ROIC
      7.61%
      11.20%
      ROE
      6.72%
      0.00%
      Gross Margin
      46.22%
      0.90
      PEG Ratio
      1.24
      Balance Sheet Safety
      N/A
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.47
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      N/A
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      2.34
      2.21%
      Dividend Yield
      0.28%
      BAC: 5Ties: 1Q: 2
      BACQ

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      BAC

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Q

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      BAC
      $2.37
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $55.63B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$131.83B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      Q
      Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      BAC
      59.5% Margin of Safety
      Price is 59.5% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $57.59
      Fair Value: $142.10
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      Q
      3.6% Margin of Safety
      Price is 3.6% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $118.37
      Fair Value: $122.85
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      BAC

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      Q

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $118?

      +15.8%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +16.0%

      The market implies +15.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +16.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      BAC
      100/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      Q
      47/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      BAC
      -2.31
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      Q
      -2.57
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      BAC
      Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
      No. of Institutional Holders4,542
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      Q
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 78.8%Retail & Other 21.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,676
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      BAC
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      Q
      1
      Buys (3M)
      3
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $467,708
      DE BONDT KARIN
      Director
      $138,136
      @ $138.14 · 2026-08-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $250,452
      @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
      GREEN BYRON
      Director
      $79,120
      @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      BAC
      0
      Sells (3M)
      5
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $20.17M
      MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
      Officer
      $4.41M
      @ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
      BRONSTEIN SHERI B
      Officer
      $2.99M
      @ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
      SCRIVENER THOMAS M
      Officer
      $2.49M
      @ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
      ATHANASIA DEAN C
      President
      $6.86M
      @ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
      BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
      Chief Financial Officer
      $3.42M
      @ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      Q
      0
      Sells (3M)
      6
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $970,297
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $59,340
      @ $148.35 · 2026-06-05
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $82,764
      @ $161.96 · 2026-05-26
      GOSS MICHAEL G.
      Officer
      $160,677
      @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
      KEMP JON D
      Chief Executive Officer
      $480,732
      @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $534.00
      @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
      KANG SANG HO
      Officer
      $186,250
      @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      BAC
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(53/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      Q
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(38/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      BAC
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
      Q
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
      View BAC Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs Q

      Is Bank of America Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to Q's 10.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $132 vs. $118).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

      BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while Q scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

      BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. Q scores 2.2 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

      Q earns 7.6% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Qnity Electronics, Inc.'s?

      Q's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). Q has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.