Compare StocksBAC vs Q

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q)

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$53.24
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$143.33

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.54 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
Q

    Risks

    BAC
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • 5 insider sales totaling $20.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    Q
    • FCF yield of 2.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • PEG ratio of 2.91 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BAC
    Q
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $776.50M
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    2.58%
    13.24
    Trailing P/E
    43.43
    10.56
    Forward P/E
    32.66
    Quality & Moat
    3.89%
    ROIC
    6.45%
    N/A
    ROE
    9.39%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    46.17%
    0.54
    PEG Ratio
    2.91
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Debt / Equity
    0.61
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.58
    2.10%
    Dividend Yield
    0.22%
    BAC: 4Ties: 1Q: 2
    BACQ

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Q

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BAC
    $2.37
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $55.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$131.83B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    Q
    Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BAC
    59.1% Margin of Safety
    Price is 59.1% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $53.24
    Fair Value: $130.24
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    Q
    54.9% Overvalued
    Price is 54.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $143.33
    Fair Value: $92.54
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Q

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $143?

    +19.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +18.3%

    The market implies +19.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +18.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BAC
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    Q
    47/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BAC
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    Q
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BAC
    Insiders 7.4%Institutions 71.5%Retail & Other 21.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,375
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    Q
    Insiders 0.0%Institutions 74.6%Retail & Other 25.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,353
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    Q
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $329,572
    NOONAN ANNE P
    Director
    $250,452
    @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
    GREEN BYRON
    Director
    $79,120
    @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    5
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $20.17M
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $4.41M
    @ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
    BRONSTEIN SHERI B
    Officer
    $2.99M
    @ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
    SCRIVENER THOMAS M
    Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
    ATHANASIA DEAN C
    President
    $6.86M
    @ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
    BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.42M
    @ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $3.66M
    @ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
    HANS LINDSAY D
    Officer
    $402,410
    @ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    Q
    0
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $828,193
    GOSS MICHAEL G.
    Officer
    $160,677
    @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
    KEMP JON D
    Chief Executive Officer
    $480,732
    @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
    NOONAN ANNE P
    Director
    $534.00
    @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
    KANG SANG HO
    Officer
    $186,250
    @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BAC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(64/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    Q
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(64/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BAC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
    Q
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
    View BAC Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis
    BAC vs Q: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io