Compare StocksBAC vs PYPL

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. PYPL is undervalued at $43, with an intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 68%. Of the two, PYPL has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
$42.51

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
PYPL
  • PayPal Holdings, Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Share count has been reduced by 19% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.91 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
PYPL
  • 6 insider sales totaling $1.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
PYPL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$5.56B
N/A
FCF Yield
14.84%
13.95
Trailing P/E
7.98
11.13
Forward P/E
7.38
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
15.11%
10.64%
ROE
25.12%
0.00%
Gross Margin
40.93%
1.02
PEG Ratio
0.79
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.12
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.35
1.97%
Dividend Yield
1.28%
BAC: 1Ties: 1PYPL: 6
BACPYPL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PYPL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PYPL
$-2.02
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$13.50B
Δ Market Cap
$-27.20B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PYPL
68.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 68.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $42.51
Fair Value: $133.36
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

PYPL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $43?

-6.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -6.7%

The market implies -6.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -6.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PYPL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PYPL
-2.54
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PYPL
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 80.1%Retail & Other 19.2%
No. of Institutional Holders2,185
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PYPL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PYPL
6
Sells (3M)
21
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.46M
KELLER FRANK
Officer
$196,194
@ $42.54 · 2026-06-03
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$144,579
@ $42.79 · 2026-06-03
NATALI CHRIS
Officer
$23,543
@ $42.65 · 2026-06-03
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$183,944
@ $44.20 · 2026-05-19
KELLER FRANK
Officer
$536,205
@ $49.96 · 2026-04-29
NATALI CHRIS
Officer
$66,128
@ $49.46 · 2026-04-29
KELLER FRANK
Officer
$1.36M
@ $46.02 · 2026-03-03
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$621,984
@ $46.02 · 2026-03-03
NATALI CHRIS
Officer
$98,764
@ $44.73 · 2026-03-03
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$1.56M
@ $41.49 · 2026-02-18
NATALI CHRIS
Officer
$49,114
@ $40.49 · 2026-02-17
KELLER FRANK
Officer
$139,816
@ $40.20 · 2026-02-06
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$249,057
@ $59.84 · 2025-11-19
WEBSTER AARON JAMES
Officer
$615,310
@ $66.29 · 2025-11-10
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$860,935
@ $68.87 · 2025-11-03
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$347,622
@ $69.52 · 2025-10-30
NATALI CHRIS
Officer
$94,987
@ $69.13 · 2025-10-30
SCOTTI DIEGO
Officer
$264,702
@ $68.97 · 2025-10-30
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$288,792
@ $69.39 · 2025-08-19
NATALI CHRIS
Officer
$492,529
@ $69.35 · 2025-07-31
SCOTTI DIEGO
Officer
$265,285
@ $69.12 · 2025-07-31
MESSEMER DEBORAH M
Director
$277,036
@ $73.00 · 2025-06-06
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$304,827
@ $73.24 · 2025-06-06
SCOTTI DIEGO
Officer
$281,158
@ $73.24 · 2025-06-06
MCGOVERN GAIL J
Director
$176,479
@ $72.15 · 2025-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PYPL
FearGreed
😨Fear(32/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
PYPL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
View BAC Full AnalysisView PYPL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs PYPL

Is Bank of America Corporation or PayPal Holdings, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PYPL trades at a 68.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $43), compared to BAC's 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $133 vs. $56).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or PayPal Holdings, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while PYPL scores 89/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PYPL scores 2.0 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or PayPal Holdings, Inc.?

PYPL earns 15.1% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or PayPal Holdings, Inc.'s?

PYPL's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). PYPL has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.