Compare StocksBAC vs PPL

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs PPL Corporation (PPL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, BAC is undervalued at $62, with a DCF intrinsic value of $966181785898 and a margin of safety of 100%. PPL is undervalued at $35, with an intrinsic value of $7626053094 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$61.95
VS
PPL
PPL Corporation
$35.21

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
PPL
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $8.37 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.14 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
PPL
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.44 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
PPL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-1.62B
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
14.31
Trailing P/E
21.60
11.74
Forward P/E
16.63
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
5.66%
11.20%
ROE
8.32%
0.00%
Gross Margin
43.29%
1.06
PEG Ratio
1.37
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
1.27
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.22
2.07%
Dividend Yield
3.24%
BAC: 4Ties: 1PPL: 3
BACPPL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PPL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.88
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PPL
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$564.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$5.8
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $61.95
Fair Value: $966181785897.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PPL
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $35.21
Fair Value: $7626053094.11
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

PPL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PPL
43/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PPL
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.4%Institutions 71.4%Retail & Other 21.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,431
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PPL
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 85.6%Retail & Other 14.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,308
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PPL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PPL
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $828,053
CORNETT JOHN GREGORY
Officer
$250,734
@ $35.56 · 2026-06-12
CROCKETT JOHN R III
Officer
$577,319
@ $36.56 · 2025-08-27
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$77,637
@ $35.86 · 2025-07-29
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$37,638
@ $34.98 · 2025-05-27
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Chief Operating Officer
$61,810
@ $34.98 · 2025-05-27
MARTIN CHRISTINE M.
Officer
$10,704
@ $34.98 · 2025-05-27
GOSMAN ANGELA K
Officer
$226,434
@ $34.66 · 2025-05-23
MARTIN CHRISTINE M.
Officer
$39,858
@ $34.78 · 2025-02-28
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$76,117
@ $33.86 · 2025-02-18
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$153,149
@ $33.86 · 2025-02-18
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$258,528
@ $33.38 · 2025-02-03
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$573,402
@ $33.38 · 2025-02-03
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$47,676
@ $33.48 · 2025-01-28
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$32,844
@ $33.48 · 2025-01-28
CROCKETT JOHN R III
Officer
$52,628
@ $33.12 · 2025-01-27
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$213,510
@ $32.16 · 2024-12-17
CROCKETT JOHN R III
Officer
$314,680
@ $34.35 · 2024-11-21
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$151,781
@ $31.74 · 2024-08-29
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PPL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(46/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
PPL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
View BAC Full AnalysisView PPL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs PPL

Is Bank of America Corporation or PPL Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $966181785898 vs. price $62), compared to PPL's 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $7626053094 vs. $35).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or PPL Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while PPL scores 43/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PPL scores 0.4 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or PPL Corporation?

PPL earns 5.7% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or PPL Corporation's?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to PPL's 66/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.