Compare StocksBAC vs PODD

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Insulet Corporation (PODD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. PODD is undervalued at $146, with an intrinsic value of $194 and a margin of safety of 25%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
PODD
Insulet Corporation
$145.76

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
PODD
  • Gross margin of 71.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.09 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Insiders have bought $0.9M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
PODD

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BAC
    PODD
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $349.90M
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    3.47%
    13.95
    Trailing P/E
    34.06
    11.13
    Forward P/E
    18.04
    Quality & Moat
    3.89%
    ROIC
    15.86%
    10.64%
    ROE
    23.00%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    71.01%
    1.02
    PEG Ratio
    1.30
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.41
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.89
    1.97%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    BAC: 4Ties: 1PODD: 3
    BACPODD

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    PODD

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BAC
    $2.37
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $55.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$131.83B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PODD
    $-0.52
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $871.7M
    Δ Market Cap
    $-455.5M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BAC
    57.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $56.20
    Fair Value: $133.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PODD
    25.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 25.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $145.76
    Fair Value: $194.46
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PODD

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $146?

    +18.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +13.4%

    The market implies +18.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +13.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BAC
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    PODD
    55/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BAC
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PODD
    -2.51
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BAC
    Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,373
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PODD
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 105.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,170
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PODD
    2
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.70M
    WEATHERMAN ELIZABETH H
    Director
    $497,490
    @ $144.20 · 2026-06-03
    STONESIFER TIMOTHY C
    Director
    $400,393
    @ $143.51 · 2026-06-03
    MINOGUE MICHAEL R
    Director
    $499,847
    @ $246.23 · 2026-02-25
    STONESIFER TIMOTHY C
    Director
    $299,884
    @ $311.73 · 2025-12-05
    CHADWICK ANA MARIA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $20,600
    @ $206.00 · 2024-08-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $20.17M
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $4.41M
    @ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
    SCRIVENER THOMAS M
    Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
    BRONSTEIN SHERI B
    Officer
    $2.99M
    @ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
    ATHANASIA DEAN C
    President
    $6.86M
    @ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
    BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.42M
    @ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $3.66M
    @ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
    HANS LINDSAY D
    Officer
    $402,410
    @ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PODD
    1
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.97M
    BORIO LUCIANA
    Director
    $59,887
    @ $143.27 · 2026-06-03
    FREDERICK WAYNE A.I.
    Director
    $542,510
    @ $293.09 · 2025-12-15
    SINGH PREM
    Officer
    $238,726
    @ $347.49 · 2025-09-08
    COUSIN LAETITIA
    Officer
    $278,002
    @ $348.81 · 2025-09-08
    BENJAMIN ERIC
    Officer
    $1.42M
    @ $332.23 · 2025-08-21
    SINGH PREM
    Officer
    $429,760
    @ $320.00 · 2025-08-07
    MANEA DANIEL
    Officer
    $390,065
    @ $300.05 · 2025-06-13
    SINGH PREM
    Officer
    $698,216
    @ $300.05 · 2025-06-13
    BORIO LUCIANA
    Director
    $147,056
    @ $305.73 · 2025-06-09
    KAPPLES JOHN W.
    General Counsel
    $1.68M
    @ $318.47 · 2025-05-14
    BENJAMIN ERIC
    Officer
    $960,320
    @ $320.00 · 2025-05-13
    HOPFIELD JESSICA
    Director
    $1.66M
    @ $317.54 · 2025-05-13
    FREDERICK WAYNE A.I.
    Director
    $501,875
    @ $275.00 · 2025-03-25
    BENJAMIN ERIC
    Officer
    $3.47M
    @ $280.00 · 2025-01-21
    BENJAMIN ERIC
    Officer
    $1.17M
    @ $267.60 · 2024-12-16
    BUDDEN LAUREN
    Officer
    $252,192
    @ $275.62 · 2024-12-10
    BORIO LUCIANA
    Director
    $139,598
    @ $274.80 · 2024-11-12
    HOPFIELD JESSICA
    Director
    $1.72M
    @ $225.26 · 2024-09-11
    SCANNELL TIMOTHY J.
    Director
    $1.13M
    @ $225.84 · 2024-09-10
    BUDDEN LAUREN
    Officer
    $333,443
    @ $221.41 · 2024-09-09
    FIELD MARK N
    Chief Technology Officer
    $305,463
    @ $220.87 · 2024-09-09
    SINGH PREM
    Officer
    $368,940
    @ $202.27 · 2024-08-30
    FIELD MARK N
    Chief Technology Officer
    $281,561
    @ $203.00 · 2024-08-28
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BAC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PODD
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(30/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BAC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    PODD
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (30)
    View BAC Full AnalysisView PODD Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs PODD

    Is Bank of America Corporation or Insulet Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to PODD's 25.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $194 vs. $146).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Insulet Corporation?

    BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while PODD scores 55/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

    BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PODD scores 9.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Insulet Corporation?

    PODD earns 15.9% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.