Compare StocksBAC vs PHM

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. PHM is undervalued at $119, with an intrinsic value of $338 and a margin of safety of 65%. Of the two, PHM has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.70
VS
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
$119.23

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
PHM
  • PulteGroup, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • PulteGroup, Inc. scores 78/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 46.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
PHM
  • FCF yield of 7.7% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 12.2x is 59% above the historical average of 7.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • 8 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
PHM
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.75B
N/A
FCF Yield
7.70%
13.32
Trailing P/E
12.18
10.90
Forward P/E
10.61
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
13.12%
11.20%
ROE
14.90%
0.00%
Gross Margin
25.56%
0.90
PEG Ratio
0.99
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.09
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.42
2.21%
Dividend Yield
0.88%
BAC: 2Ties: 2PHM: 4
BACPHM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PHM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PHM
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$7.42B
Δ Market Cap
+$12.32B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.70
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PHM
58.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 58.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $119.23
Fair Value: $286.63
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

PHM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $119?

-0.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.5%

The market implies -0.8% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +2.5%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PHM
78/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PHM
-2.48
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PHM
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 97.8%Retail & Other 1.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,452
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PHM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PHM
0
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.41M
KOART MATTHEW WILLIAM
Chief Operating Officer
$894,840
@ $120.00 · 2026-05-27
SNYDER LILA
Director
$391,264
@ $117.18 · 2026-05-08
HENRY KEVIN A
Officer
$729,574
@ $141.03 · 2026-02-24
SHELDON TODD N
General Counsel
$1.92M
@ $135.01 · 2026-02-06
O'MEARA BRIEN P.
Officer
$542,040
@ $135.51 · 2026-02-06
KOART MATTHEW WILLIAM
Chief Operating Officer
$2.08M
@ $135.79 · 2026-02-06
FOLLIARD THOMAS J
Director
$4.96M
@ $134.04 · 2026-02-05
MARSHALL RYAN R
Chief Executive Officer
$14.89M
@ $133.86 · 2026-02-05
O SHAUGHNESSY ROBERT T
Officer
$2.81M
@ $128.03 · 2025-08-14
O'MEARA BRIEN P.
Officer
$104,170
@ $127.97 · 2025-08-14
SHELDON TODD N
General Counsel
$1.62M
@ $106.50 · 2025-02-13
O'MEARA BRIEN P.
Officer
$372,386
@ $106.40 · 2025-02-13
ANDERSON BRIAN P
Director
$266,122
@ $106.45 · 2025-02-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PHM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(41/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
PHM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
View BAC Full AnalysisView PHM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs PHM

Is Bank of America Corporation or PulteGroup, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PHM trades at a 64.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $338 vs. price $119), compared to BAC's 59.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $142 vs. $58).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or PulteGroup, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while PHM scores 78/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PHM scores 6.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or PulteGroup, Inc.?

PHM earns 13.1% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or PulteGroup, Inc.'s?

PHM's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). PHM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.