Compare StocksBAC vs PH

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. PH is overvalued at $919, with an intrinsic value of $779 and a margin of safety of -18%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.90
VS
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$918.75

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
PH
  • Parker-Hannifin Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Parker-Hannifin Corporation scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 14.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
PH
  • PEG ratio of 3.11 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 10 insider sales totaling $18.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
PH
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$3.90B
N/A
FCF Yield
3.37%
13.37
Trailing P/E
32.26
10.94
Forward P/E
23.46
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
16.50%
11.20%
ROE
25.08%
0.00%
Gross Margin
37.55%
0.90
PEG Ratio
3.11
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.53
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.45
2.21%
Dividend Yield
0.87%
BAC: 4Ties: 1PH: 3
BACPH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PH
$7.61
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$7.44B
Δ Market Cap
+$56.69B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.90
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PH
17.9% Overvalued
Price is 17.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $918.75
Fair Value: $779.44
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

PH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $919?

+13.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.0%

The market implies +13.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +14.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PH
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PH
-2.48
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 90.5%Retail & Other 9.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,560
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PH
10
Sells (3M)
27
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $49.75M
THOMPSON LAURA K
Director
$153,432
@ $958.95 · 2026-09-08
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$626,363
@ $1040.47 · 2026-08-26
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$1.31M
@ $1057.00 · 2026-08-17
PAREL DINU JOHN
Chief Technology Officer
$4.73M
@ $1057.42 · 2026-08-14
HART MARK J
Officer
$2.64M
@ $1057.00 · 2026-08-14
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$738,521
@ $1055.03 · 2026-08-14
REIDY JAY
Officer
$316,731
@ $1055.77 · 2026-08-14
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$664,569
@ $1053.20 · 2026-08-14
ROSS ANDREW D.
President
$5.81M
@ $1057.57 · 2026-08-14
VERRIER JAMES R.
Director
$1.59M
@ $1058.00 · 2026-08-14
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.13M
@ $1002.13 · 2026-02-13
BENDALI RACHID
Officer
$414,777
@ $1006.74 · 2026-02-13
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$1.33M
@ $1001.51 · 2026-02-12
HART MARK J
Officer
$2.83M
@ $1009.12 · 2026-02-12
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$818,889
@ $983.06 · 2026-02-12
LEOMBRUNO TODD M.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.07M
@ $1002.34 · 2026-02-11
PARMENTIER JENNIFER A
Chief Executive Officer
$4.69M
@ $996.66 · 2026-02-11
ROSS ANDREW D.
President
$4.66M
@ $999.00 · 2026-02-11
PAREL DINU JOHN
Chief Technology Officer
$1.25M
@ $950.05 · 2026-02-02
JACOBSON MATTHEW A.
Officer
$535,766
@ $949.94 · 2026-02-02
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.38M
@ $946.48 · 2026-02-02
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$2.24M
@ $941.31 · 2026-01-30
IVES ANGELA R
Officer
$1.02M
@ $952.30 · 2026-01-30
ROSS ANDREW D.
Chief Operating Officer
$2.23M
@ $894.81 · 2025-12-11
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$3.03M
@ $864.58 · 2025-11-12
BENDALI RACHID
Officer
$1.23M
@ $852.99 · 2025-11-12
REIDY JAY
Officer
$337,675
@ $863.62 · 2025-11-12
VERRIER JAMES R.
Director
$1.13M
@ $750.00 · 2025-09-02
LEONTI JOSEPH R.
General Counsel
$3.47M
@ $750.84 · 2025-08-25
PAREL DINU JOHN
Chief Technology Officer
$817,477
@ $741.14 · 2025-08-12
IVES ANGELA R
Officer
$589,162
@ $727.36 · 2025-08-08
MALONE ROBERT W
Officer
$1.65M
@ $730.66 · 2025-08-08
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$826,524
@ $729.50 · 2025-08-08
JACOBSON MATTHEW A.
Officer
$421,510
@ $733.06 · 2025-08-08
HART MARK J
Officer
$1.65M
@ $730.22 · 2025-08-08
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$202,506
@ $728.44 · 2025-08-08
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $729.45 · 2025-08-08
ROSS ANDREW D.
President
$3.20M
@ $732.66 · 2025-08-08
REIDY JAY
Officer
$335,783
@ $675.62 · 2025-05-19
REIDY JAY
Officer
$93,056
@ $620.37 · 2025-05-02
CZAJA MARK T.
Chief Technology Officer
$266,948
@ $711.86 · 2025-01-31
PAREL DINU JOHN
Officer
$1.23M
@ $699.39 · 2024-11-06
MALONE ROBERT W
Officer
$2.76M
@ $700.24 · 2024-11-06
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$1.70M
@ $701.16 · 2024-11-06
PARMENTIER JENNIFER A
Chief Executive Officer
$3.46M
@ $704.69 · 2024-11-06
HART MARK J
Officer
$2.79M
@ $705.40 · 2024-11-06
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.08M
@ $699.29 · 2024-11-06
ROSS ANDREW D.
Chief Operating Officer
$3.43M
@ $706.04 · 2024-11-06
VERRIER JAMES R.
Director
$825,981
@ $635.37 · 2024-11-04
IVES ANGELA R
Officer
$118,773
@ $635.15 · 2024-11-01
LEONTI JOSEPH R.
General Counsel
$3.71M
@ $631.04 · 2024-11-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
PH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
View BAC Full AnalysisView PH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs PH

Is Bank of America Corporation or Parker-Hannifin Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to PH's -17.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $779 vs. $919).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Parker-Hannifin Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while PH scores 88/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PH scores 6.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Parker-Hannifin Corporation?

PH earns 16.5% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Parker-Hannifin Corporation's?

PH's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). PH has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.