Compare StocksBAC vs PCG

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs PG&E Corporation (PCG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. PCG is overvalued at $16, with an intrinsic value of $1 and a margin of safety of -1429%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
PCG
PG&E Corporation
$16.48

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
PCG
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.40 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
  • Trailing P/E of 12.8x is 22% below the historical average of 16.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 0.72 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
PCG
  • Share count has increased by 11% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • High leverage (1.84x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.0x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
PCG
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-5.57B
N/A
FCF Yield
-15.35%
13.95
Trailing P/E
12.78
11.13
Forward P/E
9.14
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
5.06%
10.64%
ROE
8.83%
0.00%
Gross Margin
39.35%
1.02
PEG Ratio
0.72
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
1.84
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.99
1.97%
Dividend Yield
1.19%
BAC: 2Ties: 1PCG: 5
BACPCG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PCG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PCG
$0.42
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$7.07B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.00B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PCG
1429.5% Overvalued
Price is 1429.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $16.48
Fair Value: $1.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

PCG

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PCG
33/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PCG
-2.69
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PCG
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 99.1%Retail & Other 0.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,258
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PCG
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $119,700
LARSEN JOHN O
Director
$119,700
@ $15.96 · 2025-11-04
DENAULT LEO PAUL
Director
$100,548
@ $15.96 · 2025-03-11
HERNANDEZ CARLOS M.
Director
$49,989
@ $15.91 · 2025-02-25
BAHRI RAJAT
Director
$50,054
@ $15.79 · 2025-02-25
DENECOUR JESSICA L
Director
$21,269
@ $15.79 · 2025-02-21
HARRIS ARNO LOCKHEART
Director
$100,052
@ $15.66 · 2025-02-20
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PCG
2
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.91M
COOPER KERRY WHORTON
Director
$20,625
@ $16.50 · 2026-06-02
GLICKMAN JASON M.
Officer
$772,766
@ $16.35 · 2026-04-28
COOPER KERRY WHORTON
Director
$46,700
@ $18.68 · 2026-03-17
PETERMAN CARLA J
Officer
$582,002
@ $18.31 · 2026-03-16
SINGH SUMEET
Officer
$1.02M
@ $18.32 · 2026-03-05
GLICKMAN JASON M.
Divisional Officer
$470,094
@ $15.95 · 2025-10-30
PETERMAN CARLA J
Officer
$562,579
@ $17.30 · 2025-04-29
GLICKMAN JASON M.
Divisional Officer
$632,155
@ $15.71 · 2025-03-10
WILLIAMS STEPHANIE N.
Officer
$242,891
@ $16.21 · 2025-03-06
SANTOS MARLENE
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$2.06M
@ $16.37 · 2025-03-04
PETERMAN CARLA J
Officer
$532,369
@ $16.37 · 2025-03-04
WILLIAMS STEPHANIE N.
Officer
$707,170
@ $18.32 · 2024-08-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PCG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
PCG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
View BAC Full AnalysisView PCG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs PCG

Is Bank of America Corporation or PG&E Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to PCG's -1429.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $1 vs. $16).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or PG&E Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while PCG scores 33/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PCG scores 0.5 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or PG&E Corporation?

PCG earns 5.1% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or PG&E Corporation's?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to PCG's 73/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs PCG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io