Compare StocksBAC vs PCG

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs PG&E Corporation (PCG)

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$53.24
VS
PCG
PG&E Corporation
$16.45

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.54 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
PCG
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.40 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
  • Trailing P/E of 12.8x is 22% below the historical average of 16.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 0.32 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
PCG
  • Share count has increased by 11% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.0x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.47 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
PCG
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-5.57B
N/A
FCF Yield
-15.38%
13.24
Trailing P/E
12.75
10.56
Forward P/E
9.13
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
5.06%
N/A
ROE
7.74%
0.00%
Gross Margin
39.35%
0.54
PEG Ratio
0.32
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Debt / Equity
1.88
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.99
2.10%
Dividend Yield
1.22%
BAC: 1Ties: 2PCG: 4
BACPCG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

PCG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PCG
$0.42
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$7.07B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.00B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $53.24
Fair Value: $130.24
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PCG
1476.5% Overvalued
Price is 1476.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $16.45
Fair Value: $1.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

PCG

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PCG
33/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PCG
-2.69
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.4%Institutions 71.5%Retail & Other 21.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,375
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PCG
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 99.3%Retail & Other 0.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,221
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PCG
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $119,700
LARSEN JOHN O
Director
$119,700
@ $15.96 · 2025-11-04
DENAULT LEO PAUL
Director
$100,548
@ $15.96 · 2025-03-11
HERNANDEZ CARLOS M.
Director
$49,989
@ $15.91 · 2025-02-25
BAHRI RAJAT
Director
$50,054
@ $15.79 · 2025-02-25
DENECOUR JESSICA L
Director
$21,269
@ $15.79 · 2025-02-21
HARRIS ARNO LOCKHEART
Director
$100,052
@ $15.66 · 2025-02-20
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PCG
4
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.89M
GLICKMAN JASON M.
Officer
$772,766
@ $16.35 · 2026-04-28
COOPER KERRY WHORTON
Director
$46,700
@ $18.68 · 2026-03-17
PETERMAN CARLA J
Officer
$582,002
@ $18.31 · 2026-03-16
SINGH SUMEET
Officer
$1.02M
@ $18.32 · 2026-03-05
GLICKMAN JASON M.
Divisional Officer
$470,094
@ $15.95 · 2025-10-30
PETERMAN CARLA J
Officer
$562,579
@ $17.30 · 2025-04-29
GLICKMAN JASON M.
Divisional Officer
$632,155
@ $15.71 · 2025-03-10
WILLIAMS STEPHANIE N.
Officer
$242,891
@ $16.21 · 2025-03-06
SANTOS MARLENE
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$2.06M
@ $16.37 · 2025-03-04
PETERMAN CARLA J
Officer
$532,369
@ $16.37 · 2025-03-04
WILLIAMS STEPHANIE N.
Officer
$707,170
@ $18.32 · 2024-08-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PCG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
PCG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
View BAC Full AnalysisView PCG Full Analysis
BAC vs PCG: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io