Compare StocksBAC vs OTIS

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. OTIS is fairly valued at $73, with an intrinsic value of $84 and a margin of safety of 13%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
OTIS
Otis Worldwide Corporation
$73.27

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
OTIS
  • Otis Worldwide Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Otis Worldwide Corporation scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.5x is 22% below the historical average of 25.0x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
OTIS
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.33 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • FCF yield of 6.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
OTIS
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.68B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.98%
13.95
Trailing P/E
19.49
11.13
Forward P/E
15.53
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
21.68%
10.64%
ROE
N/A
0.00%
Gross Margin
30.55%
1.02
PEG Ratio
1.40
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.96
1.97%
Dividend Yield
2.31%
BAC: 3Ties: 1OTIS: 3
BACOTIS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

OTIS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
OTIS
$0.59
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$2.64B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.57B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
OTIS
12.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 12.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $73.27
Fair Value: $83.96
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

OTIS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $73?

+10.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.4%

The market implies +10.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
OTIS
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
OTIS
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
OTIS
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 94.9%Retail & Other 5.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,710
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
OTIS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
OTIS
1
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $17.22M
LEFEBURE THIBAULT PIERRE MARIE
Officer
$125,184
@ $76.89 · 2026-05-07
DE MONTLIVAULT STEPHANE
Officer
$4.42M
@ $92.25 · 2026-02-12
RYAN MICHAEL PATRICK
Officer
$106,445
@ $90.05 · 2026-02-10
LAFRENIERE NORA E.
General Counsel
$2.48M
@ $90.38 · 2026-02-10
MARKS JUDITH FRAN
Chief Executive Officer
$9.29M
@ $90.29 · 2026-02-05
GREEN NEIL
Officer
$518,710
@ $86.45 · 2026-02-02
RYAN MICHAEL PATRICK
Officer
$277,647
@ $91.69 · 2025-11-05
DE MONTLIVAULT STEPHANE
Officer
$701,287
@ $105.30 · 2025-03-10
DE MONTLIVAULT STEPHANE
Officer
$2.43M
@ $97.14 · 2025-02-13
MARKS JUDITH FRAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.72M
@ $95.77 · 2025-02-10
LAFRENIERE NORA E.
General Counsel
$163,050
@ $95.91 · 2025-02-10
MARKS JUDITH FRAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.59M
@ $94.41 · 2025-02-05
LAFRENIERE NORA E.
General Counsel
$450,815
@ $94.41 · 2025-02-05
ZHENG PEIMING
Officer
$3.12M
@ $95.43 · 2025-01-31
RYAN MICHAEL PATRICK
Officer
$569,159
@ $100.95 · 2024-11-08
LUERSMAN ABBE
Officer
$909,209
@ $101.02 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
OTIS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(44/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
OTIS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
View BAC Full AnalysisView OTIS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs OTIS

Is Bank of America Corporation or Otis Worldwide Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to OTIS's 12.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $84 vs. $73).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Otis Worldwide Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while OTIS scores 90/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. OTIS scores 3.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Otis Worldwide Corporation?

OTIS earns 21.7% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Otis Worldwide Corporation's?

OTIS's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). OTIS has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.