Compare StocksBAC vs NVR

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs NVR, Inc. (NVR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, BAC is undervalued at $62, with a DCF intrinsic value of $966181785898 and a margin of safety of 100%. NVR is undervalued at $6147, with an intrinsic value of $18908 and a margin of safety of 67%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$61.95
VS
NVR
NVR, Inc.
$6147.05

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
NVR
  • NVR, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Share count has been reduced by 13% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.14 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
NVR
  • Gross margin of 21.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • PEG ratio of 4.97 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
NVR
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
N/A
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
14.31
Trailing P/E
15.97
11.74
Forward P/E
14.93
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
23.79%
11.20%
ROE
31.54%
0.00%
Gross Margin
21.84%
1.06
PEG Ratio
4.97
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.03
2.07%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
BAC: 4Ties: 1NVR: 3
BACNVR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NVR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.88
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NVR
$1.21
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.61B
Δ Market Cap
+$5.57B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $61.95
Fair Value: $966181785897.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NVR
60.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 60.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $6147.05
Fair Value: $15480.52
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

NVR

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NVR
68/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NVR
-2.11
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.4%Institutions 71.4%Retail & Other 21.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,431
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NVR
Insiders 5.5%Institutions 89.4%Retail & Other 5.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,003
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NVR
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $172,647
DEVITO MICHAEL J.
Director
$73,694
@ $6699.45 · 2026-04-24
DEVITO MICHAEL J.
Director
$98,953
@ $7068.07 · 2025-11-03
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NVR
0
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $16.88M
ROSS SUSAN WILLIAMSON
Director
$1.58M
@ $7922.06 · 2026-02-13
KELPY MATTHEW B.
Officer
$4.05M
@ $8100.00 · 2026-02-10
ROSS SUSAN WILLIAMSON
Director
$1.62M
@ $8091.62 · 2026-02-05
ROSS SUSAN WILLIAMSON
Director
$1.76M
@ $8000.00 · 2026-02-04
JUNG ALEXANDRA A
Director
$1.62M
@ $8082.44 · 2025-08-26
JUNG ALEXANDRA A
Director
$411,587
@ $8231.74 · 2025-08-22
KELPY MATTHEW B.
Officer
$4.86M
@ $8100.00 · 2025-08-13
ROSS SUSAN WILLIAMSON
Director
$981,285
@ $7850.28 · 2025-08-04
ECKERT THOMAS D
Director
$3.76M
@ $7529.89 · 2025-02-11
ECKERT THOMAS D
Director
$1.07M
@ $7515.60 · 2025-02-10
PREISER DAVID A
Director
$2.33M
@ $9302.64 · 2024-11-08
ECKERT THOMAS D
Director
$9.22M
@ $9216.32 · 2024-11-07
KELPY MATTHEW B.
Officer
$3.78M
@ $9450.00 · 2024-11-05
KELPY MATTHEW B.
Officer
$1.19M
@ $9507.30 · 2024-10-24
KELPY MATTHEW B.
Officer
$1.70M
@ $8500.00 · 2024-08-09
MARTINEZ MELQUIADES R
Director
$1.05M
@ $8372.77 · 2024-08-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NVR
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
NVR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
View BAC Full AnalysisView NVR Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs NVR

Is Bank of America Corporation or NVR, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $966181785898 vs. price $62), compared to NVR's 67.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $18908 vs. $6147).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or NVR, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while NVR scores 68/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NVR scores 13.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or NVR, Inc.?

NVR earns 23.8% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.