Compare StocksBAC vs NTAP

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs NetApp, Inc. (NTAP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. NTAP is fairly valued at $160, with an intrinsic value of $172 and a margin of safety of 7%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
NTAP
NetApp, Inc.
$159.71

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
NTAP
  • NetApp, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 70.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • NetApp, Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
NTAP
  • FCF yield of 6.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 6 insider sales totaling $1.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
NTAP
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.87B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.97%
13.95
Trailing P/E
25.15
11.13
Forward P/E
16.20
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
36.52%
10.64%
ROE
106.73%
0.00%
Gross Margin
70.74%
1.02
PEG Ratio
1.78
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.45
1.97%
Dividend Yield
1.34%
BAC: 4Ties: 1NTAP: 3
BACNTAP

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NTAP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NTAP
$5.75
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$12.61B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NTAP
7.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 7.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $159.71
Fair Value: $171.83
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

NTAP

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $160?

+10.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.9%

The market implies +10.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NTAP
94/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NTAP
-2.70
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NTAP
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 105.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,303
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NTAP
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
GUSTAFSSON PER ANDERS
Director
$499,597
@ $90.44 · 2025-03-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NTAP
6
Sells (3M)
22
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.81M
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$163,480
@ $163.48 · 2026-06-10
HELD GERALD D
Director
$1.28M
@ $180.00 · 2026-06-03
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$38,495
@ $171.09 · 2026-06-01
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$33,000
@ $120.00 · 2026-05-18
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$117,730
@ $117.73 · 2026-05-11
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$96,250
@ $96.25 · 2026-04-10
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$100,670
@ $100.67 · 2026-03-10
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$25,664
@ $101.84 · 2026-02-17
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$103,450
@ $103.45 · 2026-02-10
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$105,490
@ $105.49 · 2026-01-12
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$117,370
@ $117.37 · 2025-12-10
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$3,631
@ $110.03 · 2025-12-01
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$35,146
@ $107.48 · 2025-11-17
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$114,290
@ $114.29 · 2025-11-10
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$119,000
@ $119.00 · 2025-10-10
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$94,937
@ $121.87 · 2025-09-25
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.08M
@ $122.91 · 2025-09-17
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$123,670
@ $123.67 · 2025-09-10
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$925,225
@ $108.85 · 2025-08-18
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$105,900
@ $105.90 · 2025-08-11
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$918,680
@ $108.08 · 2025-07-21
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$106,840
@ $106.84 · 2025-07-10
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$865,130
@ $101.78 · 2025-06-16
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$54,416
@ $103.06 · 2025-06-10
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$29,829
@ $98.77 · 2025-06-03
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$850,145
@ $100.02 · 2025-05-19
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$32,593
@ $99.98 · 2025-05-16
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$44,070
@ $97.50 · 2025-05-12
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$695,555
@ $81.83 · 2025-04-21
CERNUDA REGO CESAR
President
$1.78M
@ $90.15 · 2025-03-28
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$787,277
@ $92.62 · 2025-03-17
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$48,882
@ $92.58 · 2025-03-10
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$36,263
@ $121.28 · 2025-02-19
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.01M
@ $119.04 · 2025-02-18
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$54,579
@ $120.75 · 2025-02-10
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.05M
@ $123.03 · 2025-01-21
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$52,672
@ $116.79 · 2025-01-10
CERNUDA REGO CESAR
President
$2.53M
@ $114.99 · 2024-12-30
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.06M
@ $124.29 · 2024-12-16
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$98,106
@ $127.41 · 2024-12-10
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$38,285
@ $117.44 · 2024-11-18
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $118.00 · 2024-11-18
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$62,186
@ $123.63 · 2024-11-11
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.07M
@ $126.11 · 2024-10-21
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$88,971
@ $126.20 · 2024-10-10
CERNUDA REGO CESAR
President
$2.69M
@ $122.16 · 2024-09-30
DE LORENZO DANIEL
Officer
$208,266
@ $123.60 · 2024-09-24
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$993,115
@ $116.84 · 2024-09-16
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$80,742
@ $114.69 · 2024-09-10
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $130.00 · 2024-08-19
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$86,233
@ $122.49 · 2024-08-12
KURIAN GEORGE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.11M
@ $130.36 · 2024-07-15
O'CALLAHAN ELIZABETH M
Officer
$60,148
@ $133.07 · 2024-07-10
CERNUDA REGO CESAR
President
$2.85M
@ $129.46 · 2024-06-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NTAP
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
NTAP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
View BAC Full AnalysisView NTAP Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs NTAP

Is Bank of America Corporation or NetApp, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to NTAP's 7.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $172 vs. $160).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or NetApp, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while NTAP scores 94/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NTAP scores 3.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or NetApp, Inc.?

NTAP earns 36.5% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or NetApp, Inc.'s?

NTAP's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). NTAP has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.