Compare StocksBAC vs NI

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs NiSource Inc. (NI): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. NI is overvalued at $41, with an intrinsic value of $11 and a margin of safety of -280%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.64
VS
NI
NiSource Inc.
$40.70

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
NI
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.50 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
NI
  • NiSource Inc. scores only 24/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Share count has increased by 16% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 2 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
NI
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-1.77B
N/A
FCF Yield
-9.08%
13.31
Trailing P/E
21.65
10.89
Forward P/E
18.06
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
3.18%
11.20%
ROE
8.55%
0.00%
Gross Margin
50.97%
0.90
PEG Ratio
2.11
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
1.46
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.74
2.21%
Dividend Yield
2.95%
BAC: 5Ties: 1NI: 2
BACNI

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NI
$9.36
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$927.3M
Δ Market Cap
+$8.68B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.64
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NI
279.7% Overvalued
Price is 279.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $40.70
Fair Value: $10.72
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

NI

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NI
24/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NI
-2.28
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NI
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 98.1%Retail & Other 1.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,239
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NI
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NI
1
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.85M
BIRMINGHAM-BYRD MELODY
Officer
$1.59M
@ $42.40 · 2026-08-14
BERMAN MELANIE B
Officer
$715,200
@ $47.68 · 2026-05-22
YATES LLOYD M
Chief Executive Officer
$950,066
@ $47.73 · 2026-05-21
BIRMINGHAM-BYRD MELODY
Officer
$590,425
@ $47.23 · 2026-05-20
GODE GUNNAR
Officer
$100,050
@ $46.00 · 2026-02-18
ANDERSON SHAWN
Chief Financial Officer
$562,625
@ $45.01 · 2026-02-13
CUCCIA KIMBERLY S
General Counsel
$345,040
@ $43.13 · 2025-11-25
ANDERSON SHAWN
Chief Financial Officer
$470,498
@ $42.33 · 2025-08-28
BERMAN MELANIE B
Officer
$245,499
@ $39.42 · 2025-05-30
YATES LLOYD M
Chief Executive Officer
$627,824
@ $38.93 · 2025-05-16
JESANIS MICHAEL E
Director
$386,470
@ $37.97 · 2025-05-14
ANDERSON SHAWN
Chief Financial Officer
$526,191
@ $40.79 · 2025-03-03
GODE GUNNAR
Officer
$219,560
@ $39.92 · 2025-02-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NI
FearGreed
😐Neutral(47/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
NI
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
View BAC Full AnalysisView NI Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs NI

Is Bank of America Corporation or NiSource Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to NI's -279.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $11 vs. $41).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or NiSource Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while NI scores 24/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NI scores 0.8 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or NiSource Inc.?

BAC earns 4.4% ROIC versus NI's 3.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or NiSource Inc.'s?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to NI's 66/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs NI: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io