Compare StocksBAC vs MNST

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$47.01
VS
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$73.74

Rewards

BAC
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.37 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.58 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
MNST
  • Monster Beverage Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Monster Beverage Corporation scores 96/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 42.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Bank of America Corporation scores only 20/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
MNST
  • FCF yield of 2.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
MNST
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.94B
N/A
FCF Yield
2.69%
12.34
Trailing P/E
38.01
9.49
Forward P/E
28.86
Quality & Moat
4.61%
ROIC
23.25%
N/A
ROE
23.09%
0.00%
Gross Margin
55.85%
0.58
PEG Ratio
0.57
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Debt / Equity
0.01
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-1.03
2.38%
Dividend Yield
N/A
BAC: 2Ties: 2MNST: 2
BACMNST

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

MNST

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MNST
$4.35
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$5.05B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.96B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
64.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 64.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $47.01
Fair Value: $131.82
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MNST
25.1% Overvalued
Price is 25.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $73.74
Fair Value: $58.95
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

MNST

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $74?

+15.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.6%

The market implies +15.9% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +15.6%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
20/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MNST
96/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MNST
-2.05
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 71.2%Retail & Other 21.5%
No. of Institutional Holders4,445
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MNST
Insiders 28.6%Institutions 69.4%Retail & Other 2.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,738
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MNST
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
5
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MNST
1
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.67M
KELLY THOMAS J
Chief Financial Officer
$617,760
@ $77.22 · 2026-03-13
TIRRE EMELIE
Officer
$2.20M
@ $73.31 · 2025-12-12
CARLING GUY
Officer
$2.74M
@ $71.33 · 2025-11-13
VIDERGAUZ MARK S
Director
$637,300
@ $63.73 · 2025-08-13
KELLY THOMAS J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.71M
@ $63.40 · 2025-05-29
TIRRE EMELIE
Officer
$549,398
@ $62.46 · 2025-05-16
VIDERGAUZ MARK S
Director
$212,170
@ $60.62 · 2025-05-14
KELLY THOMAS J
Chief Financial Officer
$552,700
@ $55.27 · 2025-03-14
CARLING GUY
Officer
$2.59M
@ $55.02 · 2025-03-14
TIRRE EMELIE
Officer
$5.06M
@ $55.38 · 2025-03-04
KELLY THOMAS J
Chief Financial Officer
$526,500
@ $52.65 · 2024-12-13
VIDERGAUZ MARK S
Director
$562,100
@ $56.21 · 2024-11-12
VIDERGAUZ MARK S
Director
$781,801
@ $51.85 · 2024-06-11
KELLY THOMAS J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.74M
@ $52.25 · 2024-06-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(47/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MNST
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
MNST
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
View BAC Full AnalysisView MNST Full Analysis