Compare StocksBAC vs MDLZ

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. MDLZ is overvalued at $60, with an intrinsic value of $35 and a margin of safety of -71%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
$60.12

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
MDLZ

    Risks

    BAC
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    MDLZ

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      BAC
      MDLZ
      Valuation
      N/A
      Free Cash Flow
      $2.85B
      N/A
      FCF Yield
      3.69%
      13.95
      Trailing P/E
      29.76
      11.13
      Forward P/E
      17.75
      Quality & Moat
      3.89%
      ROIC
      6.09%
      10.64%
      ROE
      10.16%
      0.00%
      Gross Margin
      28.77%
      1.02
      PEG Ratio
      1.02
      Balance Sheet Safety
      N/A
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.78
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      N/A
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      3.85
      1.97%
      Dividend Yield
      3.22%
      BAC: 2Ties: 3MDLZ: 3
      BACMDLZ

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      BAC

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      MDLZ

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      BAC
      $2.37
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $55.63B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$131.83B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      MDLZ
      $-4.39
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $5.03B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-22.05B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      BAC
      57.9% Margin of Safety
      Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $56.20
      Fair Value: $133.45
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      MDLZ
      71.1% Overvalued
      Price is 71.1% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $60.12
      Fair Value: $35.15
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      BAC

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      MDLZ

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $60?

      +16.6%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.0%

      The market implies +16.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      BAC
      100/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      MDLZ
      48/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      BAC
      -2.31
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      MDLZ
      -2.43
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      BAC
      Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
      No. of Institutional Holders4,373
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      MDLZ
      Insiders 0.2%Institutions 90.1%Retail & Other 9.6%
      No. of Institutional Holders2,492
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      BAC
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      MDLZ
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      BAC
      0
      Sells (3M)
      5
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $20.17M
      MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
      Officer
      $4.41M
      @ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
      SCRIVENER THOMAS M
      Officer
      $2.49M
      @ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
      BRONSTEIN SHERI B
      Officer
      $2.99M
      @ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
      ATHANASIA DEAN C
      President
      $6.86M
      @ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
      BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
      Chief Financial Officer
      $3.42M
      @ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
      MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
      Officer
      $3.66M
      @ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
      HANS LINDSAY D
      Officer
      $402,410
      @ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      MDLZ
      0
      Sells (3M)
      1
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $186,000
      VALLE GUSTAVO CARLOS
      Officer
      $186,000
      @ $62.00 · 2026-02-13
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      BAC
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(74/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      MDLZ
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(47/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      BAC
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
      MDLZ
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
      View BAC Full AnalysisView MDLZ Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs MDLZ

      Is Bank of America Corporation or Mondelez International, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to MDLZ's -71.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $35 vs. $60).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Mondelez International, Inc.?

      BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while MDLZ scores 48/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

      BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MDLZ scores 2.2 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Mondelez International, Inc.?

      MDLZ earns 6.1% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Mondelez International, Inc.'s?

      BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to MDLZ's 39/100 (Unsafe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.