Compare Stocks › BAC vs LW

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BAC is undervalued at $50, with a DCF intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. LW is overvalued at $54, with an intrinsic value of $23 and a margin of safety of -133%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01
VS
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
$54.08

Rewards

BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
LW
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 71.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★7 insider purchases over the past 12 months with a buy/sell ratio above 3:1 — a sustained pattern of insider confidence.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.85 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
LW
  • ⚠Gross margin of 20.2% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 29.6x is 66% above the historical average of 17.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
LW
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$540.20M
N/A
FCF Yield
7.25%
11.94
Trailing P/E
29.55
9.64
Forward P/E
15.31
Quality & Moat
3.80%
ROIC
8.59%
10.73%
ROE
14.17%
0.00%
Gross Margin
20.20%
0.91
PEG Ratio
0.85
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
2.10
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.55
2.56%
Dividend Yield
2.81%
BAC: 2Ties: 1LW: 5
BACLW

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

LW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
LW
$-10.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$784.3M
Δ Market Cap
$-8.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
72.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $50.01
Fair Value: $180.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
LW
133.2% Overvalued
Price is 133.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $54.08
Fair Value: $23.20
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

LW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $54?

+16.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.3%

The market implies +16.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
LW
46/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
LW
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,517
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
LW
Insiders 2.7%Institutions 97.3%
No. of Institutional Holders723
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
LW
0
Buys (3M)
7
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $19.42M
GRAY JAMES D.
Chief Financial Officer
$409,225
@ $40.92 · 2026-05-11
GRAY JAMES D.
Chief Financial Officer
$199,781
@ $43.85 · 2026-04-27
JANA PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, L.P.
Unknown
$6.37M
@ $42.48 · 2026-04-15
JANA PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, L.P.
Unknown
$9.70M
@ $41.11 · 2026-04-08
PRESTAGE NORMAN
Director
$103,500
@ $41.40 · 2026-04-07
BENSEN PETER J
Director
$197,225
@ $39.45 · 2026-04-06
CRAPS JAN ELI B.
Officer and Director
$2.43M
@ $48.65 · 2026-02-06
NIBLOCK ROBERT A
Director
$182,819
@ $60.94 · 2025-01-13
JURGENSEN WILLIAM GERALD
Director
$316,350
@ $63.27 · 2024-12-23
BLIXT CHARLES A
Director
$75,901
@ $63.25 · 2024-12-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
LW
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
JONES GREGORY W
Officer
$99,973
@ $62.48 · 2025-10-02
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
LW
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
LW
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
View BAC Full AnalysisView LW Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs LW

Is Bank of America Corporation or Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to LW's -133.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $23 vs. $54).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.?▼

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while LW scores 46/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LW scores 2.7 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.?▼

LW earns 8.6% ROIC versus BAC's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s?▼

LW's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). LW has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs LW: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io