Compare Stocks › BAC vs LVS

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BAC is undervalued at $50, with a DCF intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. LVS is undervalued at $37, with an intrinsic value of $53 and a margin of safety of 30%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01
VS
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
$36.97

Rewards

BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
LVS
  • ★Gross margin of 78.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 12% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.

Risks

BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
LVS
  • ⚠13 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
LVS
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$2.11B
N/A
FCF Yield
8.80%
11.94
Trailing P/E
15.15
9.64
Forward P/E
11.95
Quality & Moat
3.80%
ROIC
13.45%
10.73%
ROE
207.08%
0.00%
Gross Margin
78.63%
0.91
PEG Ratio
0.97
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.83
2.56%
Dividend Yield
3.25%
BAC: 3Ties: 1LVS: 4
BACLVS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

LVS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
LVS
$2.81
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.57B
Δ Market Cap
+$7.20B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
72.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $50.01
Fair Value: $180.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
LVS
30.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 30.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $36.97
Fair Value: $53.17
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

LVS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $37?

+7.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.8%

The market implies +7.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +5.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
LVS
38/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
LVS
-2.17
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,517
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
LVS
Insiders 63.7%Institutions 43.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,037
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
LVS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
PANT MUKTESH
Director
$1.00M
@ $43.51 · 2025-03-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
LVS
0
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $237.49M
FORMAN CHARLES D
Director
$616,626
@ $54.09 · 2026-04-27
DUMONT PATRICK
Chief Executive Officer
$3.29M
@ $54.75 · 2026-03-17
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$83.39M
@ $66.71 · 2025-12-17
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$50.09M
@ $66.79 · 2025-12-15
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$26.57M
@ $66.42 · 2025-12-11
DUMONT PATRICK
President
$9.22M
@ $67.96 · 2025-12-03
DUMONT PATRICK
President
$15.91M
@ $69.88 · 2025-12-02
HUDSON D. ZACHARY
Officer
$3.75M
@ $70.37 · 2025-12-01
CHAFETZ IRWIN
Director
$2.09M
@ $69.76 · 2025-12-01
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$7.02M
@ $70.17 · 2025-12-01
HYZAK RANDY A.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.82M
@ $66.45 · 2025-11-25
HUDSON D. ZACHARY
Officer
$6.50M
@ $64.99 · 2025-11-07
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$25.22M
@ $63.04 · 2025-11-06
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$23.68M
@ $59.20 · 2025-10-31
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$53.02M
@ $58.92 · 2025-10-30
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$17.80M
@ $59.32 · 2025-10-27
FORMAN CHARLES D
Director
$1.08M
@ $54.13 · 2025-09-10
FORMAN CHARLES D
Director
$526,300
@ $52.63 · 2025-08-06
HUDSON D. ZACHARY
Officer
$1.33M
@ $51.40 · 2024-11-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
LVS
FearGreed
😨Fear(30/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
LVS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (30)
View BAC Full AnalysisView LVS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs LVS

Is Bank of America Corporation or Las Vegas Sands Corp. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to LVS's 30.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $53 vs. $37).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Las Vegas Sands Corp.?▼

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while LVS scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LVS scores 2.7 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Las Vegas Sands Corp.?▼

LVS earns 13.4% ROIC versus BAC's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s?▼

LVS's dividend earns a safety score of 81/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). LVS has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

BAC vs LVS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io