Compare StocksBAC vs LUV

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. LUV is undervalued at $48, with an intrinsic value of $66 and a margin of safety of 27%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
LUV
Southwest Airlines Co.
$47.97

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
LUV
  • Share count has been reduced by 13% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Trailing P/E of 32.0x is 22% below the historical average of 41.2x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 0.32 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
LUV
  • Gross margin of 23.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 2 out of 2 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Beneish M-Score of -1.64 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
LUV
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-372.38M
N/A
FCF Yield
-1.59%
13.95
Trailing P/E
31.98
11.13
Forward P/E
10.59
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
7.83%
10.64%
ROE
10.06%
0.00%
Gross Margin
23.01%
1.02
PEG Ratio
0.32
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.45
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.39
1.97%
Dividend Yield
1.52%
BAC: 3Ties: 2LUV: 3
BACLUV

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

LUV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
LUV
$11.48
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$114.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$1.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
LUV
22.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 22.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $47.97
Fair Value: $62.25
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

LUV

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
LUV
37/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
LUV
-1.64
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
LUV
Insiders 1.0%Institutions 89.5%Retail & Other 9.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,130
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
LUV
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $145,455
SARETSKY GREGG A
Director
$100,447
@ $30.03 · 2025-08-06
FEINBERG SARAH
Director
$45,008
@ $30.01 · 2025-08-05
SARETSKY GREGG A
Director
$100,169
@ $27.29 · 2025-04-30
BREBER PIERRE R.
Director
$268,877
@ $26.89 · 2025-04-29
HESS DAVID P
Director
$198,900
@ $26.52 · 2025-04-28
FEINBERG SARAH
Director
$15,740
@ $31.48 · 2025-03-14
WATSON PATRICIA A
Director
$99,935
@ $30.58 · 2025-03-13
REYNOLDS CHRISTOPHER P.
Director
$99,955
@ $30.68 · 2025-03-13
CUSH C DAVID
Director
$150,150
@ $30.03 · 2025-03-12
ATHERTON LISA M
Director
$3,691
@ $31.28 · 2025-01-30
GANGWAL RAKESH
Director
$7.11M
@ $29.39 · 2024-10-01
GANGWAL RAKESH
Director
$4.83M
@ $29.15 · 2024-10-01
GANGWAL RAKESH
Director
$3.75M
@ $29.49 · 2024-10-01
GANGWAL RAKESH
Director
$15.87M
@ $29.89 · 2024-10-01
GANGWAL RAKESH
Director
$19.30M
@ $29.98 · 2024-10-01
KELLY GARY C
Officer and Director
$1.00M
@ $29.52 · 2024-09-30
GANGWAL RAKESH
Director
$34.92M
@ $29.47 · 2024-09-30
GANGWAL RAKESH
Director
$20.93M
@ $29.65 · 2024-09-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
LUV
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $302,056
JONES JUSTIN
Officer
$302,056
@ $37.36 · 2025-12-05
RUTHERFORD LINDA B
Officer
$132,386
@ $34.39 · 2024-12-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
LUV
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
LUV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
View BAC Full AnalysisView LUV Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs LUV

Is Bank of America Corporation or Southwest Airlines Co. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to LUV's 27.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $66 vs. $48).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Southwest Airlines Co.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while LUV scores 37/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LUV scores 2.2 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Southwest Airlines Co.?

LUV earns 7.8% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Southwest Airlines Co.'s?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to LUV's 46/100 (Borderline). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Does Southwest Airlines Co. have accounting red flags?

LUV's Beneish M-Score of -1.6 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, BAC scores -2.3, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.

BAC vs LUV: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io