Compare StocksBAC vs LII

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Lennox International Inc. (LII): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. LII is fairly valued at $532, with an intrinsic value of $506 and a margin of safety of -5%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
LII
Lennox International Inc.
$532.43

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
LII
  • Lennox International Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Lennox International Inc. scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 47.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
LII
  • High leverage (1.57x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Beneish M-Score of -1.37 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
  • 13 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
LII
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$638.80M
N/A
FCF Yield
3.45%
13.95
Trailing P/E
23.65
11.13
Forward P/E
19.95
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
18.77%
10.64%
ROE
76.79%
0.00%
Gross Margin
33.19%
1.02
PEG Ratio
1.52
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
1.57
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.65
1.97%
Dividend Yield
1.03%
BAC: 4Ties: 1LII: 3
BACLII

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

LII

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
LII
$4.89
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.72B
Δ Market Cap
+$8.41B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
LII
5.2% Overvalued
Price is 5.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $532.43
Fair Value: $506.12
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

LII

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $532?

+10.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.1%

The market implies +10.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +14.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
LII
74/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
LII
-1.37
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
LII
Insiders 9.6%Institutions 79.4%Retail & Other 11.0%
No. of Institutional Holders939
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
LII
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
LII
1
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $24.99M
KOSEL CHRIS A
Officer
$529,001
@ $544.80 · 2026-05-06
WALL SHANE D.
Director
$54,001
@ $540.01 · 2026-02-25
TESKE TODD J
Director
$373,415
@ $533.45 · 2026-02-04
KOSEL CHRIS A
Officer
$136,271
@ $536.50 · 2026-02-04
TESKE TODD J
Director
$295,110
@ $491.85 · 2025-11-11
KOSEL CHRIS A
Officer
$177,558
@ $591.86 · 2025-08-22
QUINTOS KAREN H.
Director
$657,665
@ $607.82 · 2025-08-20
QUINTOS KAREN H.
Director
$222,394
@ $609.30 · 2025-08-20
SESSA DANIEL M
Officer
$1.86M
@ $670.04 · 2025-07-23
NORRIS JOHN W III
Director
$14.88M
@ $666.20 · 2025-07-23
NORRIS JOHN W III
Director
$1.96M
@ $613.72 · 2025-07-10
NORRIS JOHN W III
Director
$1.93M
@ $606.00 · 2025-07-03
NORRIS JOHN W III
Director
$1.91M
@ $600.00 · 2025-07-01
KOSEL CHRIS A
Officer
$289,140
@ $568.06 · 2025-05-07
KOSEL CHRIS A
Officer
$124,975
@ $644.20 · 2025-02-21
TORRES JOHN D
Officer
$1.04M
@ $582.55 · 2025-02-04
BUCK SHERRY L
Director
$330,370
@ $660.74 · 2024-11-27
TESKE TODD J
Director
$337,760
@ $675.52 · 2024-11-25
KOSEL CHRIS A
Officer
$125,098
@ $625.49 · 2024-11-13
NASSAB JOSEPH
Officer
$398,091
@ $619.12 · 2024-11-05
BEDAPUDI PRAKASH
Chief Technology Officer
$596,370
@ $618.00 · 2024-11-05
WALL SHANE D.
Director
$199,215
@ $612.97 · 2024-10-28
TORRES JOHN D
Officer
$360,789
@ $620.98 · 2024-10-25
BEDAPUDI PRAKASH
Chief Technology Officer
$3.14M
@ $584.00 · 2024-08-28
BUCK SHERRY L
Director
$291,735
@ $583.47 · 2024-08-23
QUINTOS KAREN H.
Director
$1.02M
@ $574.87 · 2024-08-20
NORRIS JOHN W III
Director
$976,412
@ $574.36 · 2024-08-20
TESKE TODD J
Director
$1.15M
@ $574.05 · 2024-08-19
BEDARD GARY S
Officer
$685,351
@ $576.41 · 2024-08-19
WALL SHANE D.
Director
$201,831
@ $576.66 · 2024-08-19
BEDAPUDI PRAKASH
Chief Technology Officer
$1.98M
@ $578.00 · 2024-08-19
NASSAB JOSEPH
Officer
$664,195
@ $570.12 · 2024-08-16
SESSA DANIEL M
Officer
$7.68M
@ $570.97 · 2024-08-16
TORRES JOHN D
Officer
$4.12M
@ $571.21 · 2024-08-16
KOSEL CHRIS A
Officer
$1.00M
@ $573.79 · 2024-07-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
LII
FearGreed
😐Neutral(43/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
LII
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
View BAC Full AnalysisView LII Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs LII

Is Bank of America Corporation or Lennox International Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to LII's -5.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $506 vs. $532).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Lennox International Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while LII scores 74/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LII scores 7.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Lennox International Inc.?

LII earns 18.8% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Lennox International Inc.'s?

LII's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). LII has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Does Lennox International Inc. have accounting red flags?

LII's Beneish M-Score of -1.4 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, BAC scores -2.3, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.