Compare Stocks › BAC vs LH

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BAC is undervalued at $50, with a DCF intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. LH is overvalued at $361, with an intrinsic value of $187 and a margin of safety of -93%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01
VS
LH
Labcorp Holdings Inc.
$361.39

Rewards

BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
LH

    Risks

    BAC
    • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    LH
    • ⚠Insiders have sold $2.7M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 7.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BAC
    LH
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.06B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    3.60%
    11.94
    Trailing P/E
    29.62
    9.64
    Forward P/E
    18.45
    Quality & Moat
    3.80%
    ROIC
    8.00%
    10.73%
    ROE
    11.44%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    28.96%
    0.91
    PEG Ratio
    1.60
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.74
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.81
    2.56%
    Dividend Yield
    0.80%
    BAC: 4Ties: 1LH: 3
    BACLH

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    LH

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BAC
    $2.37
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $55.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$131.83B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LH
    $2.13
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.30B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.78B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BAC
    72.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $50.01
    Fair Value: $180.08
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LH
    93.0% Overvalued
    Price is 93.0% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $361.39
    Fair Value: $187.29
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    LH

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $361?

    +14.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +14.9%

    The market implies +14.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BAC
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    LH
    52/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BAC
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LH
    -2.55
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BAC
    Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,517
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LH
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 101.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,461
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LH
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $20.17M
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $4.41M
    @ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
    SCRIVENER THOMAS M
    Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
    BRONSTEIN SHERI B
    Officer
    $2.99M
    @ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
    ATHANASIA DEAN C
    President
    $6.86M
    @ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
    BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.42M
    @ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LH
    3
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $11.92M
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $954,060
    @ $318.02 · 2026-08-17
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $320.37 · 2026-08-11
    SUMMY AMY B
    Officer
    $283,428
    @ $306.74 · 2026-08-04
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $439,107
    @ $309.23 · 2026-08-03
    KYLE KATHRYN W
    Officer
    $26,329
    @ $286.18 · 2026-07-02
    VAUGHN BRYAN T
    Officer
    $66,968
    @ $286.19 · 2026-07-02
    KYLE KATHRYN W
    Officer
    $201,084
    @ $263.89 · 2026-06-08
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $254.50 · 2026-05-11
    MELTZER JONATHAN C
    Officer
    $224,055
    @ $267.05 · 2026-03-27
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $436,093
    @ $267.05 · 2026-03-27
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.44M
    @ $279.96 · 2026-03-03
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $156,000
    @ $285.19 · 2026-02-27
    CAVENEY BRIAN J
    Officer
    $429,458
    @ $286.31 · 2026-02-24
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $185,108
    @ $277.94 · 2026-02-19
    MELTZER JONATHAN C
    Officer
    $25,267
    @ $290.43 · 2026-02-12
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $284.38 · 2026-02-11
    MELTZER JONATHAN C
    Officer
    $25,188
    @ $276.79 · 2026-02-10
    MELTZER JONATHAN C
    Officer
    $24,247
    @ $275.53 · 2026-02-09
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.51M
    @ $262.75 · 2025-11-11
    PARHAM RICHELLE P
    Director
    $1.78M
    @ $254.28 · 2025-10-31
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $1.06M
    @ $271.42 · 2025-08-13
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.51M
    @ $266.78 · 2025-08-11
    GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
    Director
    $529,900
    @ $264.95 · 2025-07-30
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $52,727
    @ $261.02 · 2025-07-29
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $980,000
    @ $280.00 · 2025-07-24
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $132,500
    @ $265.00 · 2025-07-01
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $130,000
    @ $260.00 · 2025-06-11
    CAVENEY BRIAN J
    Officer
    $494,000
    @ $247.00 · 2025-06-03
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.52M
    @ $248.73 · 2025-05-12
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $452,884
    @ $238.36 · 2025-05-01
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $200,838
    @ $242.27 · 2025-05-01
    SCHROEDER MARK S
    Chief Operating Officer
    $610,450
    @ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
    SUMMY AMY B
    Officer
    $175,606
    @ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $127,817
    @ $255.63 · 2025-03-05
    SCHROEDER MARK S
    President
    $1.33M
    @ $249.23 · 2025-02-28
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $330,208
    @ $251.30 · 2025-02-25
    SUMMY AMY B
    Officer
    $56,590
    @ $250.40 · 2025-02-24
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $347,739
    @ $246.10 · 2025-02-18
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $244.62 · 2025-02-11
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $235,000
    @ $235.00 · 2025-01-07
    EISENBERG GLENN A
    Officer
    $2.82M
    @ $240.43 · 2024-12-02
    GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
    Director
    $241,000
    @ $241.00 · 2024-12-02
    SUMMY AMY B
    Officer
    $877,142
    @ $238.94 · 2024-11-22
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $239,419
    @ $239.42 · 2024-11-21
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.51M
    @ $243.47 · 2024-11-11
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BAC
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LH
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(71/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BAC
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    LH
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (71)
    View BAC Full AnalysisView LH Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs LH

    Is Bank of America Corporation or Labcorp Holdings Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to LH's -93.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $187 vs. $361).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Labcorp Holdings Inc.?▼

    BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while LH scores 52/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

    BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LH scores 3.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Labcorp Holdings Inc.?▼

    LH earns 8.0% ROIC versus BAC's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Labcorp Holdings Inc.'s?▼

    LH's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). LH has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    BAC vs LH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io