Compare Stocks › BAC vs LDOS

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BAC is undervalued at $50, with a DCF intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. LDOS is fairly valued at $143, with an intrinsic value of $150 and a margin of safety of 5%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01
VS
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
$142.98

Rewards

BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
LDOS
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 23.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

Risks

BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
LDOS
  • ⚠Gross margin of 17.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.46 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
LDOS
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.63B
N/A
FCF Yield
9.06%
11.94
Trailing P/E
13.35
9.64
Forward P/E
11.40
Quality & Moat
3.80%
ROIC
13.70%
10.73%
ROE
27.78%
0.00%
Gross Margin
17.79%
0.91
PEG Ratio
2.46
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
1.09
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.45
2.56%
Dividend Yield
1.20%
BAC: 4Ties: 1LDOS: 3
BACLDOS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

LDOS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
LDOS
$3.68
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.28B
Δ Market Cap
+$8.39B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
72.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $50.01
Fair Value: $180.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
LDOS
4.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 4.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $142.98
Fair Value: $150.32
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

LDOS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $143?

+3.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +3.4%

The market implies +3.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +3.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
LDOS
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
LDOS
-2.61
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,517
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
LDOS
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 84.2%Retail & Other 15.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,134
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
LDOS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
GEER NOEL BROWN
Director
$322,261
@ $161.13 · 2024-11-20
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
LDOS
2
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.18M
MAY GARY STEPHEN
Director
$140,845
@ $140.84 · 2026-09-01
GEER NOEL BROWN
Director
$1.41M
@ $140.66 · 2026-08-11
MAY GARY STEPHEN
Director
$197,005
@ $132.75 · 2026-05-07
PORTER ELIZABETH A
Officer
$317,555
@ $158.78 · 2026-04-07
PORTER ELIZABETH A
Officer
$576,635
@ $192.21 · 2026-01-20
PORTER ELIZABETH A
Officer
$543,130
@ $181.04 · 2025-12-19
HULL STEPHEN EDWARD
Officer
$2.23M
@ $178.14 · 2025-09-04
STEVENS ROY E
Officer
$493,398
@ $181.66 · 2025-08-25
HULL STEPHEN EDWARD
Officer
$2.30M
@ $178.27 · 2025-08-20
MAY GARY STEPHEN
Director
$356,104
@ $178.05 · 2025-08-11
DAHLBERG GREGORY R.
Director
$168,911
@ $177.43 · 2025-08-11
HULL STEPHEN EDWARD
Officer
$1.33M
@ $176.39 · 2025-08-08
DAHLBERG GREGORY R.
Director
$193,190
@ $154.55 · 2025-05-09
MAY GARY STEPHEN
Director
$279,279
@ $131.24 · 2025-02-18
KOVARIK ROBERT C JR
Director
$203,322
@ $134.56 · 2025-02-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
LDOS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
LDOS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
View BAC Full AnalysisView LDOS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs LDOS

Is Bank of America Corporation or Leidos Holdings, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to LDOS's 4.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $150 vs. $143).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Leidos Holdings, Inc.?▼

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while LDOS scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LDOS scores 4.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Leidos Holdings, Inc.?▼

LDOS earns 13.7% ROIC versus BAC's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s?▼

LDOS's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). LDOS has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.