Compare StocksBAC vs KR

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs The Kroger Co. (KR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. KR is overvalued at $57, with an intrinsic value of $2 and a margin of safety of -3469%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
KR
The Kroger Co.
$56.61

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
KR
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 34.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 14% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • FCF yield of 9.7% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
KR
  • ROIC has declined by 5.2 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 24.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Trailing P/E of 36.8x is 66% above the historical average of 22.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
KR
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$3.40B
N/A
FCF Yield
9.74%
13.95
Trailing P/E
36.76
11.13
Forward P/E
10.08
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
13.08%
10.64%
ROE
14.41%
0.00%
Gross Margin
24.10%
1.02
PEG Ratio
0.60
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
3.60
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.64
1.97%
Dividend Yield
2.18%
BAC: 1Ties: 1KR: 6
BACKR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

KR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
KR
$0.64
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$3.28B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.09B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
KR
3468.9% Overvalued
Price is 3468.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.61
Fair Value: $1.59
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

KR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $57?

+20.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.1%

The market implies +20.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +5.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
KR
56/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
KR
-3.11
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
KR
Insiders 8.4%Institutions 81.1%Retail & Other 10.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,838
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
KR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
KR
0
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $14.42M
MOORE CLYDE R
Director
$272,834
@ $71.61 · 2025-07-16
MOORE CLYDE R
Director
$1.89M
@ $70.50 · 2025-07-11
ADCOCK MARY ELLEN
Officer
$2.44M
@ $71.16 · 2025-06-27
ARREAGA GABRIEL
Officer
$2.75M
@ $72.44 · 2025-06-25
COSSET YAEL
Officer
$5.23M
@ $73.49 · 2025-06-23
FIKE CARIN L
Officer and Treasurer
$1.22M
@ $73.79 · 2025-06-23
MASSA TIMOTHY A
Officer
$622,710
@ $74.00 · 2025-06-23
WHEATLEY CHRISTINE STRICK
Officer
$2.16M
@ $72.07 · 2025-04-23
COSSET YAEL
Officer
$2.19M
@ $73.00 · 2025-04-22
MASSA TIMOTHY A
Officer
$1.65M
@ $73.00 · 2025-04-22
ARREAGA GABRIEL
Officer
$995,866
@ $71.82 · 2025-04-21
NICHOLS BRIAN W
Officer
$72,030
@ $72.03 · 2025-04-21
FOLEY TODD A
Officer
$989,442
@ $70.67 · 2025-04-17
JABBAR VALERIE L
Officer
$2.16M
@ $69.08 · 2025-04-16
WHEATLEY CHRISTINE STRICK
Officer
$2.08M
@ $69.44 · 2025-04-04
KIMBALL KENNETH C.
Officer
$719,081
@ $65.37 · 2025-03-21
ARREAGA GABRIEL
Officer
$1.05M
@ $65.63 · 2025-03-19
COSSET YAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$1.17M
@ $66.19 · 2025-03-17
NICHOLS BRIAN W
Officer
$94,933
@ $65.88 · 2025-03-17
COSSET YAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$691,190
@ $65.76 · 2025-03-14
NICHOLS BRIAN W
Officer
$86,723
@ $66.71 · 2025-03-13
MASSA TIMOTHY A
Officer
$1.97M
@ $66.56 · 2025-03-13
ADCOCK MARY ELLEN
Officer
$6.90M
@ $66.39 · 2025-03-13
COSSET YAEL
Chief Investment Officer
$7.84M
@ $68.08 · 2025-03-10
FOLEY TODD A
Chief Financial Officer
$1.87M
@ $66.62 · 2025-03-07
FOLEY TODD A
Chief Financial Officer
$1.04M
@ $61.44 · 2024-12-19
AITKEN STUART W
Officer
$8.38M
@ $63.18 · 2024-12-12
COSSET YAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$1.17M
@ $58.39 · 2024-12-10
COSSET YAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$1.76M
@ $58.54 · 2024-12-09
MASSA TIMOTHY A
Officer
$1.56M
@ $60.12 · 2024-12-06
NICHOLS BRIAN W
Officer
$386,248
@ $55.80 · 2024-10-07
JABBAR VALERIE L
Officer
$167,730
@ $55.91 · 2024-09-23
FIKE CARIN L
Officer and Treasurer
$167,269
@ $55.57 · 2024-09-17
NICHOLS BRIAN W
Officer
$222,800
@ $55.70 · 2024-09-17
NICHOLS BRIAN W
Officer
$109,060
@ $54.53 · 2024-07-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
KR
FearGreed
😨Fear(27/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
KR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (27)
View BAC Full AnalysisView KR Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs KR

Is Bank of America Corporation or The Kroger Co. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to KR's -3468.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $2 vs. $57).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or The Kroger Co.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while KR scores 56/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. KR scores 4.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or The Kroger Co.?

KR earns 13.1% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or The Kroger Co.'s?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to KR's 64/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.