Compare StocksBAC vs KLAC

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs KLA Corporation (KLAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. KLAC is overvalued at $168, with an intrinsic value of $148 and a margin of safety of -13%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$58.15
VS
KLAC
KLA Corporation
$168.06

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
KLAC
  • KLA Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 61.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • KLA Corporation scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
KLAC
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • FCF yield of 1.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 45.8x is 31% above the historical average of 35.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
KLAC
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$3.77B
N/A
FCF Yield
1.72%
13.43
Trailing P/E
45.79
10.99
Forward P/E
25.06
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
36.46%
11.20%
ROE
87.50%
0.00%
Gross Margin
61.30%
0.90
PEG Ratio
1.62
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.20
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.21
2.21%
Dividend Yield
0.55%
BAC: 4Ties: 1KLAC: 3
BACKLAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

KLAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
KLAC
$15.71
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$8.92B
Δ Market Cap
+$140.15B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $58.15
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
KLAC
11.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 11.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $168.06
Fair Value: $189.82
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

KLAC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $168?

+18.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +22.4%

The market implies +18.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +22.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
KLAC
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
KLAC
-2.06
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
KLAC
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 93.8%Retail & Other 6.0%
No. of Institutional Holders3,317
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
KLAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
KLAC
16
Sells (3M)
22
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $112.33M
WALLACE RICHARD P
Chief Executive Officer
$12.38M
@ $171.88 · 2026-09-15
LORIG BRIAN W.
Officer
$12.40M
@ $208.13 · 2026-08-13
HIGGINS BREN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.61M
@ $209.87 · 2026-08-12
KHAN AHMAD A
Officer
$6.60M
@ $198.95 · 2026-08-11
WALLACE RICHARD P
Chief Executive Officer
$17.42M
@ $198.95 · 2026-08-11
WILKINSON MARY BETH
Officer
$339,774
@ $204.56 · 2026-08-10
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$108,212
@ $204.56 · 2026-08-10
WILKINSON MARY BETH
Officer
$4.31M
@ $197.57 · 2026-08-07
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$475,156
@ $197.57 · 2026-08-07
WILKINSON MARY BETH
Officer
$2.70M
@ $195.50 · 2026-08-05
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$880,532
@ $195.50 · 2026-08-05
WILKINSON MARY BETH
Officer
$822,879
@ $191.59 · 2026-08-04
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$299,838
@ $191.59 · 2026-08-04
HIGGINS BREN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.36M
@ $265.69 · 2026-07-02
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$52,075
@ $265.69 · 2026-07-02
WILKINSON MARY BETH
Officer
$4.11M
@ $285.30 · 2026-07-01
WALLACE RICHARD P
Chief Executive Officer
$9.99M
@ $2213.37 · 2026-06-11
WALLACE RICHARD P
Chief Executive Officer
$8.09M
@ $1794.00 · 2026-05-12
HANLEY JENEANNE MICHELLE
Director
$1.03M
@ $1874.71 · 2026-05-11
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$558,069
@ $1879.02 · 2026-05-11
HIGGINS BREN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.79M
@ $1237.01 · 2025-12-16
WALLACE RICHARD P
Chief Executive Officer
$13.00M
@ $1203.10 · 2025-11-11
KHAN AHMAD A
Officer
$4.11M
@ $900.00 · 2025-09-05
KHAN AHMAD A
Officer
$12.09M
@ $881.50 · 2025-08-29
HIGGINS BREN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.02M
@ $878.53 · 2025-08-20
LORIG BRIAN W.
Officer
$7.35M
@ $913.68 · 2025-08-12
WALLACE RICHARD P
Chief Executive Officer
$9.87M
@ $913.68 · 2025-08-12
WILKINSON MARY BETH
Officer
$933,086
@ $913.00 · 2025-08-08
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$308,594
@ $913.00 · 2025-08-08
WILKINSON MARY BETH
Officer
$1.76M
@ $917.00 · 2025-08-05
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$468,587
@ $917.00 · 2025-08-05
WILKINSON MARY BETH
Officer
$684,220
@ $896.75 · 2025-08-04
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$286,960
@ $896.75 · 2025-08-04
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$34,768
@ $891.49 · 2025-07-02
WILKINSON MARY BETH
Officer
$1.18M
@ $891.16 · 2025-06-30
HIGGINS BREN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$781,023
@ $766.46 · 2025-05-22
WALLACE RICHARD P
Chief Executive Officer
$7.38M
@ $683.30 · 2025-05-06
HIGGINS BREN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.08M
@ $724.62 · 2025-03-25
WALLACE RICHARD P
Chief Executive Officer
$9.49M
@ $663.01 · 2024-11-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
KLAC
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
KLAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
View BAC Full AnalysisView KLAC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs KLAC

Is Bank of America Corporation or KLA Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to KLAC's -13.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $148 vs. $168).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or KLA Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while KLAC scores 88/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. KLAC scores 14.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or KLA Corporation?

KLAC earns 36.5% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or KLA Corporation's?

KLAC's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). KLAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs KLAC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io