Compare StocksBAC vs J

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. J is overvalued at $121, with an intrinsic value of $88 and a margin of safety of -38%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
J
Jacobs Solutions Inc.
$120.97

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
J
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 20.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • 3 insider purchases with no sells in the past 3 months — insiders are putting their own money in.
  • PEG ratio of 0.38 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
J
  • Gross margin of 23.4% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
J
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$512.45M
N/A
FCF Yield
3.59%
13.95
Trailing P/E
35.68
11.13
Forward P/E
14.69
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
-1.24%
10.64%
ROE
9.38%
0.00%
Gross Margin
23.42%
1.00
PEG Ratio
0.38
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.97
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.11
1.99%
Dividend Yield
1.19%
BAC: 5Ties: 1J: 2
BACJ

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

J

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
J
$2.33
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.34B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.12B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
J
38.2% Overvalued
Price is 38.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $120.97
Fair Value: $87.54
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

J

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $121?

+16.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.0%

The market implies +16.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
J
62/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
J
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
J
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 92.4%Retail & Other 7.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,249
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
J
3
Buys (3M)
6
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $813,527
PRAGADA ROBERT V
Chief Executive Officer
$400,035
@ $111.09 · 2026-05-15
FERNANDEZ MANUEL J
Director
$28,478
@ $112.56 · 2026-05-13
FERNANDEZ MANUEL J
Director
$49,137
@ $121.93 · 2026-05-08
FERNANDEZ MANUEL J
Director
$99,785
@ $130.78 · 2025-11-24
NATHAMUNI VENKATESH
Chief Financial Officer
$101,332
@ $135.11 · 2025-11-24
ROBERTSON PETER J
Director
$134,760
@ $134.76 · 2025-11-24
FERNANDEZ MANUEL J
Director
$17,489
@ $120.61 · 2025-05-08
FERNANDEZ MANUEL J
Director
$33,646
@ $123.70 · 2025-03-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
J
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $193,147
MILLER SHANNON
President
$193,147
@ $134.13 · 2026-03-06
GUSTAFSON SHELETTE M.
Officer
$625,633
@ $150.14 · 2024-08-29
THOMPSON CHRISTOPHER M T
Director
$286,320
@ $150.85 · 2024-08-29
EBERHART RALPH EDWARD
Director
$286,288
@ $150.12 · 2024-08-29
ALLEN WILLIAM B JR
Officer
$212,586
@ $146.51 · 2024-08-16
DEMETRIOU STEVEN J
Officer and Director
$1.03M
@ $146.88 · 2024-08-01
DEMETRIOU STEVEN J
Officer and Director
$979,580
@ $139.94 · 2024-07-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
J
FearGreed
😨Fear(38/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
J
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
View BAC Full AnalysisView J Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs J

Is Bank of America Corporation or Jacobs Solutions Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to J's -38.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $88 vs. $121).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Jacobs Solutions Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while J scores 62/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. J scores 3.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Jacobs Solutions Inc.?

BAC earns 3.9% ROIC versus J's -1.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Jacobs Solutions Inc.'s?

J's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). J has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs J: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io