Compare StocksBAC vs IT

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Gartner, Inc. (IT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. IT is undervalued at $127, with an intrinsic value of $304 and a margin of safety of 58%. Of the two, IT has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
IT
Gartner, Inc.
$127.49

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
IT
  • Gartner, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 69.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Gartner, Inc. scores 97/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
IT
  • High leverage (26.63x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
IT
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.06B
N/A
FCF Yield
12.47%
13.95
Trailing P/E
12.61
11.13
Forward P/E
8.33
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
30.67%
10.64%
ROE
94.88%
0.00%
Gross Margin
68.99%
1.02
PEG Ratio
0.57
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
26.63
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.26
1.97%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
BAC: 1Ties: 1IT: 6
BACIT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

IT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
IT
$-3.05
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.87B
Δ Market Cap
$-8.74B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
IT
58.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 58.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $127.49
Fair Value: $304.28
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

IT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $127?

+1.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -2.4%

The market implies +1.3% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies -2.4%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
IT
97/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
IT
-2.91
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
IT
Insiders 3.5%Institutions 118.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,072
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
IT
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.05M
RINELLO JOHN J
Officer
$7,706
@ $154.12 · 2026-02-05
PAGLIUCA STEPHEN G
Director
$9.94M
@ $229.57 · 2025-12-10
GUTIERREZ JOSE M.
Director
$99,997
@ $239.80 · 2025-08-18
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
IT
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $161,708
HERKES CLAIRE L
Officer
$84,983
@ $231.56 · 2025-12-03
RINELLO JOHN J
Officer
$50,505
@ $229.57 · 2025-12-03
RINELLO JOHN J
Officer
$26,220
@ $249.71 · 2025-08-22
FUCHS ANNE SUTHERLAND
Director
$270,705
@ $413.29 · 2025-06-12
DYKSTRA KAREN E
Director
$792,439
@ $421.51 · 2025-06-09
HENSEL SCOTT
Officer
$2.42M
@ $448.78 · 2025-05-21
JAIN AKHIL
Officer
$281,250
@ $450.00 · 2025-05-19
HERKES CLAIRE L
Officer
$84,068
@ $447.17 · 2025-05-16
JAIN AKHIL
Officer
$11,250
@ $450.00 · 2025-05-15
WARTINBEE WILLIAM JAMES III
Officer
$241,610
@ $449.09 · 2025-05-13
SAFIAN CRAIG W
Chief Financial Officer
$1.54M
@ $450.17 · 2025-05-13
KRANICH ROBIN B.
Officer
$322,574
@ $436.50 · 2025-05-07
RINELLO JOHN J
Officer
$47,562
@ $436.35 · 2025-05-07
RINELLO JOHN J
Officer
$44,387
@ $493.19 · 2025-02-27
GENOVESE YVONNE
Officer
$881,258
@ $506.47 · 2025-02-26
SERRA EILEEN
Director
$587,724
@ $489.77 · 2025-02-24
RINELLO JOHN J
Officer
$47,746
@ $530.51 · 2025-02-10
GENOVESE YVONNE
Officer
$89,931
@ $519.83 · 2024-12-11
WARTINBEE WILLIAM JAMES III
Officer
$98,949
@ $523.54 · 2024-12-06
HERKES CLAIRE L
Officer
$214,229
@ $521.24 · 2024-11-27
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$2.62M
@ $524.02 · 2024-11-26
BISSON PETER E
Director
$921,367
@ $528.61 · 2024-11-15
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$6.98M
@ $552.79 · 2024-11-13
JAIN AKHIL
Officer
$165,652
@ $554.02 · 2024-11-13
HENSEL SCOTT
Officer
$888,000
@ $555.00 · 2024-11-13
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$12.47M
@ $548.48 · 2024-11-12
DAWKINS ALWYN
Officer
$550,340
@ $550.34 · 2024-11-12
SRIBAR VALENTIN T
Officer
$475,580
@ $553.00 · 2024-11-11
BECK JOSEPH P
Officer
$1.35M
@ $553.34 · 2024-11-11
ALLARD KENNETH
Officer
$880,952
@ $548.88 · 2024-11-11
SAFIAN CRAIG W
Chief Financial Officer
$1.94M
@ $550.81 · 2024-11-11
HALL EUGENE A.
Chief Executive Officer
$9.99M
@ $546.24 · 2024-11-08
DAWKINS ALWYN
Officer
$1.09M
@ $546.80 · 2024-11-08
JAIN AKHIL
Officer
$121,878
@ $549.00 · 2024-11-08
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$7.76M
@ $537.20 · 2024-11-07
DYKSTRA KAREN E
Director
$793,530
@ $529.02 · 2024-11-06
HERKES CLAIRE L
Officer
$241,873
@ $506.01 · 2024-09-13
HALL EUGENE A.
Chief Executive Officer
$17.21M
@ $505.40 · 2024-09-12
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$3.95M
@ $501.72 · 2024-09-12
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$1.06M
@ $500.15 · 2024-09-10
JAIN AKHIL
Officer
$246,000
@ $492.00 · 2024-09-09
WARTINBEE WILLIAM JAMES III
Officer
$103,276
@ $491.79 · 2024-09-09
DAWKINS ALWYN
Officer
$489,550
@ $489.55 · 2024-08-29
KRANICH ROBIN B.
Officer
$1.76M
@ $490.00 · 2024-08-29
HENSEL SCOTT
Officer
$2.73M
@ $490.00 · 2024-08-29
HERKES CLAIRE L
Officer
$323,757
@ $483.22 · 2024-08-27
GENOVESE YVONNE
Officer
$214,244
@ $483.62 · 2024-08-26
JAIN AKHIL
Officer
$194,000
@ $485.00 · 2024-08-15
SAFIAN CRAIG W
Chief Financial Officer
$3.05M
@ $483.57 · 2024-08-15
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$4.80M
@ $480.08 · 2024-08-13
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$2.39M
@ $478.26 · 2024-08-07
DYKSTRA KAREN E
Director
$783,521
@ $465.55 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
IT
FearGreed
🥶Extreme Fear(17/100)

"Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
IT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (17)
View BAC Full AnalysisView IT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs IT

Is Bank of America Corporation or Gartner, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, IT trades at a 58.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $304 vs. price $127), compared to BAC's 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $133 vs. $56).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Gartner, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while IT scores 97/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. IT scores 3.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Gartner, Inc.?

IT earns 30.7% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.