Compare StocksBAC vs IRM

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. IRM is overvalued at $114, with an intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$58.12
VS
IRM
Iron Mountain Incorporated
$114.24

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.88 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
IRM
  • Trailing P/E of 81.0x is 32% below the historical average of 119.7x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
IRM
  • PEG ratio of 2.70 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 7.7x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.83 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
IRM
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-436.09M
N/A
FCF Yield
-1.28%
13.42
Trailing P/E
81.02
10.98
Forward P/E
41.87
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
5.71%
11.20%
ROE
N/A
0.00%
Gross Margin
54.21%
0.88
PEG Ratio
2.70
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
7.74
2.21%
Dividend Yield
3.08%
BAC: 3Ties: 1IRM: 3
BACIRM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

IRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
IRM
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-1.94B
Δ Market Cap
+$10.04B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $58.12
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
IRM
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $114.24
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

IRM

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
IRM
51/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
IRM
-2.66
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
IRM
Insiders 0.9%Institutions 88.3%Retail & Other 10.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,578
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
IRM
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2,954
KELLY CHRISTIE BARTON
Director
$2,954
@ $89.52 · 2025-11-19
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
IRM
8
Sells (3M)
34
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $120.46M
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.39M
@ $114.08 · 2026-09-01
KIDD MARK
Officer
$693,600
@ $115.60 · 2026-09-01
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$578,000
@ $115.60 · 2026-09-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.68M
@ $121.67 · 2026-08-07
KIDD MARK
Officer
$736,200
@ $122.70 · 2026-08-07
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$1.51M
@ $127.13 · 2026-08-06
KIDD MARK
Officer
$753,720
@ $125.62 · 2026-07-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.73M
@ $122.83 · 2026-07-01
KIDD MARK
Officer
$760,200
@ $126.70 · 2026-06-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.91M
@ $127.55 · 2026-06-01
BORGES DANIEL
Officer
$902,220
@ $125.50 · 2026-05-21
RAKOWICH WALTER C.
Director
$94,209
@ $124.45 · 2026-05-20
ARWAY PAMELA M.
Director
$244,011
@ $128.97 · 2026-05-12
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.96M
@ $128.93 · 2026-05-08
KIDD MARK
Officer
$767,460
@ $127.91 · 2026-05-08
KIDD MARK
Officer
$616,260
@ $102.71 · 2026-04-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.95M
@ $102.71 · 2026-04-01
BHARGAVA MITHU
Officer
$6.25M
@ $104.62 · 2026-03-19
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$10.48M
@ $106.25 · 2026-03-05
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$21.13M
@ $107.10 · 2026-03-04
ALLERTON JENNIFER
Director
$762,160
@ $108.88 · 2026-03-02
KIDD MARK
Officer
$643,620
@ $107.27 · 2026-03-02
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$15.00M
@ $109.39 · 2026-03-02
KIDD MARK
Officer
$649,020
@ $108.17 · 2026-02-20
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.16M
@ $108.17 · 2026-02-20
KIDD MARK
Officer
$498,600
@ $83.10 · 2026-01-02
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.20M
@ $83.17 · 2026-01-02
KIDD MARK
Officer
$510,000
@ $85.00 · 2025-12-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$5.76M
@ $83.34 · 2025-12-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$7.10M
@ $102.75 · 2025-11-03
KIDD MARK
Officer
$615,060
@ $102.51 · 2025-11-03
KIDD MARK
Officer
$736,591
@ $100.82 · 2025-10-31
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$7.07M
@ $102.34 · 2025-10-01
KIDD MARK
Officer
$609,780
@ $101.63 · 2025-10-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.19M
@ $89.56 · 2025-09-03
KIDD MARK
Officer
$546,300
@ $91.05 · 2025-09-02
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.54M
@ $94.55 · 2025-08-01
KIDD MARK
Officer
$583,200
@ $97.20 · 2025-08-01
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$1.69M
@ $97.20 · 2025-08-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.94M
@ $100.36 · 2025-07-01
KIDD MARK
Officer
$612,120
@ $102.02 · 2025-07-01
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$1.73M
@ $100.00 · 2025-07-01
RAKOWICH WALTER C.
Director
$89,973
@ $99.97 · 2025-06-04
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.83M
@ $98.77 · 2025-06-02
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$1.70M
@ $98.19 · 2025-06-02
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$807,384
@ $96.14 · 2025-05-22
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.64M
@ $96.09 · 2025-05-02
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$5.95M
@ $86.11 · 2025-04-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$21.25M
@ $89.50 · 2025-03-04
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$21.25M
@ $89.50 · 2025-03-04
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$15.76M
@ $91.33 · 2025-03-03
BORGES DANIEL
Officer
$597,240
@ $92.84 · 2025-03-03
BHARGAVA MITHU
Officer
$161,356
@ $92.84 · 2025-03-03
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.90M
@ $99.83 · 2025-02-03
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$7.25M
@ $104.85 · 2025-01-02
BHARGAVA MITHU
Officer
$863,401
@ $104.49 · 2024-12-23
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $113.55 · 2024-12-11
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.76M
@ $118.47 · 2024-11-11
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.73M
@ $117.52 · 2024-10-08
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.70M
@ $116.43 · 2024-09-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
IRM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
IRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View BAC Full AnalysisView IRM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs IRM

Is Bank of America Corporation or Iron Mountain Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to IRM's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $114).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Iron Mountain Incorporated?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while IRM scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. IRM scores 0.8 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Iron Mountain Incorporated?

IRM earns 5.7% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Iron Mountain Incorporated's?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to IRM's 39/100 (Unsafe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs IRM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io