Compare StocksBAC vs IFF

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. IFF is overvalued at $85, with an intrinsic value of $55 and a margin of safety of -56%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.70
VS
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
$85.07

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
IFF

    Risks

    BAC
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    IFF
    • Altman Z-Score of 1.34 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BAC
    IFF
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $-1.72B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    -7.93%
    13.32
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    10.90
    Forward P/E
    21.48
    Quality & Moat
    4.37%
    ROIC
    3.57%
    11.20%
    ROE
    -5.55%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    36.58%
    0.90
    PEG Ratio
    1.72
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.41
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.99
    2.21%
    Dividend Yield
    1.90%
    BAC: 5Ties: 1IFF: 1
    BACIFF

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    IFF

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BAC
    $2.37
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $55.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$131.83B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    IFF
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-4.44B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-9.50B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BAC
    59.4% Margin of Safety
    Price is 59.4% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $57.70
    Fair Value: $142.10
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    IFF
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $85.07
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    IFF

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BAC
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    IFF
    53/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BAC
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    IFF

    Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BAC
    Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,542
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    IFF
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 109.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,104
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    IFF
    0
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $32.48M
    FRIBOURG PAUL J
    Director
    $20.32M
    @ $74.29 · 2026-06-01
    FYRWALD J. ERIK
    Chief Executive Officer
    $995,204
    @ $69.79 · 2026-03-13
    FRIBOURG PAUL J
    Director
    $10.97M
    @ $70.12 · 2026-03-12
    LANDSMAN STEPHEN N
    General Counsel
    $196,788
    @ $63.48 · 2025-12-12
    FRIBOURG PAUL J
    Director
    $1.00M
    @ $64.80 · 2025-08-07
    FYRWALD J. ERIK
    Chief Executive Officer
    $993,714
    @ $64.95 · 2025-08-07
    O'BYRNE KEVIN
    Director
    $342,240
    @ $76.05 · 2025-05-22
    LANDSMAN STEPHEN N
    General Counsel
    $927,356
    @ $77.28 · 2025-05-19
    PALAU HERNANDEZ MARGARITA
    Director
    $65,807
    @ $77.42 · 2025-05-19
    KHAN MEHMOOD
    Director
    $301,314
    @ $75.33 · 2025-05-15
    FYRWALD J. ERIK
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.85M
    @ $73.97 · 2025-05-09
    O'BYRNE KEVIN
    Director
    $522,833
    @ $80.44 · 2025-03-05
    FYRWALD J. ERIK
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.01M
    @ $80.24 · 2025-03-04
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $20.17M
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $4.41M
    @ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
    BRONSTEIN SHERI B
    Officer
    $2.99M
    @ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
    SCRIVENER THOMAS M
    Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
    ATHANASIA DEAN C
    President
    $6.86M
    @ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
    BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.42M
    @ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    IFF
    3
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.32M
    TELES DE MENDONCA ANA PAULA
    Officer
    $475,692
    @ $83.19 · 2026-08-17
    BIRENKRANT MARC
    Officer
    $85,000
    @ $85.00 · 2026-08-07
    DEVEAU MICHAEL
    Officer
    $754,970
    @ $85.55 · 2026-08-06
    YILDIZ BERIL
    Officer
    $185,604
    @ $77.33 · 2025-05-19
    ARORA YUVRAJ
    Officer
    $458,775
    @ $91.75 · 2024-11-11
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BAC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    IFF
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(56/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BAC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    IFF
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
    View BAC Full AnalysisView IFF Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs IFF

    Is Bank of America Corporation or International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to IFF's -56.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $55 vs. $85).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.?

    BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while IFF scores 53/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

    BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. IFF scores 1.3 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.?

    BAC earns 4.4% ROIC versus IFF's 3.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.'s?

    BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to IFF's 35/100 (Unsafe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.