Compare StocksBAC vs HSIC

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. HSIC is fairly valued at $85, with an intrinsic value of $85 and a margin of safety of 0%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$58.11
VS
HSIC
Henry Schein, Inc.
$84.52

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
HSIC
  • Share count has been reduced by 12% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
HSIC

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BAC
    HSIC
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $446.00M
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    4.73%
    13.42
    Trailing P/E
    24.64
    10.98
    Forward P/E
    14.09
    Quality & Moat
    4.37%
    ROIC
    7.24%
    11.20%
    ROE
    8.85%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    31.32%
    0.90
    PEG Ratio
    1.77
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.77
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    3.39
    2.21%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    BAC: 5Ties: 1HSIC: 2
    BACHSIC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    HSIC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BAC
    $2.37
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $55.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$131.83B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    HSIC
    $-1.48
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.20B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-1.78B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BAC
    59.1% Margin of Safety
    Price is 59.1% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $58.11
    Fair Value: $142.10
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    HSIC
    0.4% Margin of Safety
    Price is 0.4% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $84.52
    Fair Value: $84.85
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    HSIC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $85?

    +11.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +12.9%

    The market implies +11.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BAC
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    HSIC
    57/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BAC
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    HSIC
    -2.53
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BAC
    Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,542
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    HSIC
    Insiders 0.8%Institutions 112.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders788
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    HSIC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $691,900
    DANIEL WILLIAM K
    Director
    $691,900
    @ $69.19 · 2026-05-11
    DANIEL WILLIAM K
    Director
    $670,800
    @ $67.08 · 2025-08-07
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $20.17M
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $4.41M
    @ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
    BRONSTEIN SHERI B
    Officer
    $2.99M
    @ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
    SCRIVENER THOMAS M
    Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
    ATHANASIA DEAN C
    President
    $6.86M
    @ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
    BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.42M
    @ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    HSIC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.03M
    POPECK THOMAS C
    Officer
    $98,630
    @ $72.79 · 2026-03-19
    KUEHN KURT P
    Director
    $224,565
    @ $78.96 · 2026-03-10
    LASKAWY PHILIP A
    Director
    $228,544
    @ $80.36 · 2026-03-05
    MLOTEK MARK E
    Officer
    $478,740
    @ $80.80 · 2026-03-04
    CONNETT BRADFORD C
    Officer
    $287,161
    @ $71.15 · 2025-03-19
    LASKAWY PHILIP A
    Director
    $184,999
    @ $71.04 · 2025-03-19
    KUEHN KURT P
    Director
    $199,396
    @ $71.55 · 2025-03-05
    ETTINGER MICHAEL S.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $918,000
    @ $75.00 · 2024-11-18
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BAC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(54/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    HSIC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(50/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BAC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
    HSIC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
    View BAC Full AnalysisView HSIC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs HSIC

    Is Bank of America Corporation or Henry Schein, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to HSIC's 0.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $85 vs. $85).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Henry Schein, Inc.?

    BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while HSIC scores 57/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

    BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. HSIC scores 2.8 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Henry Schein, Inc.?

    HSIC earns 7.2% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.