Compare StocksBAC vs HII

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. HII is undervalued at $285, with an intrinsic value of $498 and a margin of safety of 43%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
HII
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
$285.43

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
HII
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
HII
  • Gross margin of 12.4% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 5.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
HII
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$634.12M
N/A
FCF Yield
5.64%
13.95
Trailing P/E
18.53
11.13
Forward P/E
14.01
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
8.23%
10.64%
ROE
12.20%
0.00%
Gross Margin
12.45%
1.02
PEG Ratio
1.09
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.53
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.39
1.97%
Dividend Yield
1.84%
BAC: 4Ties: 1HII: 3
BACHII

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

HII

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
HII
$3.40
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.22B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.14B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
HII
42.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 42.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $285.43
Fair Value: $498.23
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

HII

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $285?

+9.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.0%

The market implies +9.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
HII
57/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
HII
-2.12
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
HII
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 93.4%Retail & Other 6.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,155
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
HII
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $954,730
STANAGE NICKIE LEE
Director
$954,730
@ $272.78 · 2025-08-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
HII
1
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.84M
HUGHES EDMOND E. JR.
Officer
$1.12M
@ $319.58 · 2026-05-28
STIEHLE THOMAS E.
Chief Financial Officer
$1.94M
@ $430.54 · 2026-03-06
BOUDREAUX CHAD N.
Officer
$1.86M
@ $422.45 · 2026-03-05
CHEWNING ERIC D
Officer
$736,848
@ $433.44 · 2026-03-04
SCHUCK NICOLAS GERARD
Officer
$786,711
@ $457.39 · 2026-03-02
GREEN EDGAR ANDY III
Officer
$2.04M
@ $457.83 · 2026-03-02
BOUDREAUX CHAD N.
Officer
$247,216
@ $314.52 · 2025-11-26
HUGHES EDMOND E. JR.
Officer
$268,124
@ $315.44 · 2025-11-20
SCHUCK NICOLAS GERARD
Officer
$146,389
@ $314.82 · 2025-11-04
HARKER VICTORIA D
Director
$316,605
@ $316.61 · 2025-11-04
HARKER VICTORIA D
Director
$268,630
@ $268.63 · 2025-08-05
GREEN EDGAR ANDY III
Officer
$1.12M
@ $265.67 · 2025-08-04
BOUDREAUX CHAD N.
Officer
$449,873
@ $228.94 · 2025-06-03
HUGHES EDMOND E. JR.
Officer
$301,483
@ $231.91 · 2025-05-07
KELLY ANASTASI D
Director
$455,857
@ $232.58 · 2025-05-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
HII
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
HII
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
View BAC Full AnalysisView HII Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs HII

Is Bank of America Corporation or Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to HII's 42.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $498 vs. $285).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while HII scores 57/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. HII scores 2.8 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.?

HII earns 8.2% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.'s?

HII's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). HII has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.