Compare StocksBAC vs HIG

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. (HIG)

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$53.24
VS
HIG
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
$135.81

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.54 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
HIG
  • The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. scores 97/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 14.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.91 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $20.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
HIG
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.07 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 6 insider sales totaling $22.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
HIG
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$5.60B
N/A
FCF Yield
15.05%
13.24
Trailing P/E
9.56
10.56
Forward P/E
9.42
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
14.96%
N/A
ROE
20.20%
0.00%
Gross Margin
38.17%
0.54
PEG Ratio
0.23
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Debt / Equity
0.23
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.00
2.10%
Dividend Yield
1.77%
BAC: 1Ties: 1HIG: 5
BACHIG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

HIG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
HIG
$1.85
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$7.71B
Δ Market Cap
+$14.27B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $53.24
Fair Value: $130.24
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
HIG
60.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 60.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $135.81
Fair Value: $347.17
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

HIG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $136?

-2.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -7.8%

The market implies -2.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -7.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
HIG
97/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
HIG
-2.55
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.4%Institutions 71.5%Retail & Other 21.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,375
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
HIG
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 96.5%Retail & Other 3.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,619
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
HIG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
5
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
HIG
6
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $85.24M
RODDEN LORI A
Officer
$5.62M
@ $138.05 · 2026-03-10
NIDERNO ALLISON G
Officer
$98,583
@ $140.63 · 2026-03-04
NIDERNO ALLISON G
Officer
$53,226
@ $142.32 · 2026-02-26
TOOKER ADIN M
President
$1.17M
@ $140.54 · 2026-02-25
RODDEN LORI A
Officer
$805,723
@ $141.83 · 2026-02-11
SWIFT CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$14.21M
@ $140.78 · 2026-02-04
SWIFT CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$27.55M
@ $136.41 · 2026-02-02
COSTELLO BETH ANN
Chief Financial Officer
$4.83M
@ $136.58 · 2026-01-02
TOOKER ADIN M
President
$928,205
@ $137.90 · 2025-11-26
RODDEN LORI A
Officer
$959,829
@ $122.41 · 2025-10-29
COSTELLO BETH ANN
Chief Financial Officer
$4.36M
@ $123.50 · 2025-08-04
RODDEN LORI A
Officer
$949,212
@ $123.11 · 2025-08-01
SWIFT CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$12.84M
@ $130.84 · 2025-05-16
TOOKER ADIN M
President
$2.82M
@ $128.61 · 2025-05-15
PAIANO ROBERT W
Officer
$1.16M
@ $128.05 · 2025-05-15
STEPNOWSKI AMY M.
Officer
$6.88M
@ $125.89 · 2025-05-05
SWIFT CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$12.15M
@ $125.50 · 2025-05-02
NIDERNO ALLISON G
Officer
$129,664
@ $119.51 · 2025-04-28
SWIFT CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$168,001
@ $125.00 · 2025-04-03
SWIFT CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$11.81M
@ $120.39 · 2025-03-17
PAIANO ROBERT W
Officer
$1.54M
@ $117.20 · 2025-03-11
SWIFT CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$12,000
@ $120.00 · 2025-03-04
TOOKER ADIN M
President
$1.53M
@ $112.60 · 2025-02-18
TOOKER ADIN M
Officer
$803,479
@ $117.04 · 2024-11-15
SONI DEEPA
Officer
$2.24M
@ $110.96 · 2024-11-05
PAIANO ROBERT W
Officer
$1.46M
@ $110.95 · 2024-07-31
RODDEN LORI A
Officer
$428,522
@ $111.16 · 2024-07-31
FISHER MICHAEL R
Officer
$414,809
@ $101.47 · 2024-07-01
BENNETT JONATHAN R
Officer
$2.67M
@ $100.46 · 2024-05-09
COSTELLO BETH ANN
Chief Financial Officer
$7.19M
@ $99.71 · 2024-05-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
HIG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
HIG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View BAC Full AnalysisView HIG Full Analysis
BAC vs HIG: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io