Compare StocksBAC vs GRMN

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Garmin Ltd. (GRMN): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. GRMN is overvalued at $279, with an intrinsic value of $208 and a margin of safety of -34%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$58.15
VS
GRMN
Garmin Ltd.
$278.59

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
GRMN
  • Garmin Ltd. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 60.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Garmin Ltd. scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
GRMN
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 2.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 28.8x is 29% above the historical average of 22.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
GRMN
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.36B
N/A
FCF Yield
2.54%
13.43
Trailing P/E
28.75
10.99
Forward P/E
25.31
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
19.93%
11.20%
ROE
21.89%
0.00%
Gross Margin
60.08%
0.90
PEG Ratio
2.94
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-1.06
2.21%
Dividend Yield
1.52%
BAC: 4Ties: 1GRMN: 3
BACGRMN

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GRMN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GRMN
$8.32
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.57B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.39B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $58.15
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GRMN
33.6% Overvalued
Price is 33.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $278.59
Fair Value: $208.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

GRMN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $279?

+13.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.3%

The market implies +13.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +16.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GRMN
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GRMN
-2.26
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GRMN
Insiders 14.7%Institutions 58.3%Retail & Other 27.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,426
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GRMN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GRMN
4
Sells (3M)
20
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.04M
WANG CHENG-WEI
Officer
$2.98M
@ $299.36 · 2026-08-18
MAXFIELD JOSHUA H.
General Counsel
$335,385
@ $291.13 · 2026-07-31
BIDDLECOMBE SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$288,779
@ $292.88 · 2026-07-31
PEMBLE CLIFTON A
Chief Executive Officer
$1.21M
@ $300.00 · 2026-07-29
HARTNETT JOSEPH J
Director
$169,476
@ $263.57 · 2026-06-09
HARTNETT JOSEPH J
Director
$151,806
@ $236.09 · 2026-06-09
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$475,812
@ $237.91 · 2026-06-05
MINARD LAURIE A
Officer
$262,365
@ $242.03 · 2026-05-08
LINK EDWARD J.
Officer
$310,647
@ $243.64 · 2026-03-10
MUNN MATTHEW W.
Officer
$1.32M
@ $250.97 · 2026-02-26
LYMAN SUSAN
Officer
$956,258
@ $251.32 · 2026-02-26
DESBOIS PATRICK
Chief Operating Officer
$1.68M
@ $251.65 · 2026-02-26
PEMBLE CLIFTON A
Chief Executive Officer
$5.01M
@ $251.58 · 2026-02-26
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$877,541
@ $251.66 · 2026-02-26
MINARD LAURIE A
Officer
$206,976
@ $247.28 · 2026-02-23
BIDDLECOMBE SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$257,854
@ $240.76 · 2026-02-20
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$103,181
@ $215.41 · 2026-02-13
DESBOIS PATRICK
Chief Operating Officer
$773,868
@ $210.40 · 2026-01-07
PEMBLE CLIFTON A
Chief Executive Officer
$2.15M
@ $206.23 · 2025-12-16
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$512,562
@ $206.26 · 2025-12-16
WANG CHENG-WEI
Officer
$2.37M
@ $232.48 · 2025-08-27
LINK EDWARD J.
Officer
$395,140
@ $230.00 · 2025-08-11
MINARD LAURIE A
Officer
$181,010
@ $230.00 · 2025-08-06
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$399,685
@ $215.00 · 2025-07-03
PEMBLE CLIFTON A
Chief Executive Officer
$1.61M
@ $203.25 · 2025-06-16
LYMAN SUSAN
Officer
$609,677
@ $215.51 · 2025-03-10
MUNN MATTHEW W.
Officer
$1.04M
@ $225.31 · 2025-02-28
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$625,969
@ $226.55 · 2025-02-28
DESBOIS PATRICK
Chief Operating Officer
$1.57M
@ $227.15 · 2025-02-26
PEMBLE CLIFTON A
Chief Executive Officer
$1.64M
@ $227.14 · 2025-02-26
MINARD LAURIE A
Officer
$177,952
@ $226.11 · 2025-02-24
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$366,277
@ $207.99 · 2024-12-20
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$193,655
@ $216.62 · 2024-12-16
PEMBLE CLIFTON A
Chief Executive Officer
$2.20M
@ $216.58 · 2024-12-16
BIDDLECOMBE SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$123,328
@ $210.10 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GRMN
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
GRMN
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
View BAC Full AnalysisView GRMN Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs GRMN

Is Bank of America Corporation or Garmin Ltd. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to GRMN's -33.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $208 vs. $279).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Garmin Ltd.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while GRMN scores 91/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GRMN scores 14.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Garmin Ltd.?

GRMN earns 19.9% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Garmin Ltd.'s?

GRMN's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). GRMN has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

BAC vs GRMN: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io