Compare Stocks › BAC vs GLW

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Corning Incorporated (GLW): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BAC is undervalued at $50, with a DCF intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. GLW is fairly valued at $123, with an intrinsic value of $139 and a margin of safety of 11%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01
VS
GLW
Corning Incorporated
$123.31

Rewards

BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
GLW
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.71 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 4.04 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
GLW
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 1.3% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $3.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
GLW
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.41B
N/A
FCF Yield
1.33%
11.94
Trailing P/E
49.92
9.64
Forward P/E
27.25
Quality & Moat
3.80%
ROIC
11.31%
10.73%
ROE
17.88%
0.00%
Gross Margin
36.48%
0.91
PEG Ratio
0.71
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.46
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.49
2.56%
Dividend Yield
0.91%
BAC: 3Ties: 1GLW: 4
BACGLW

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GLW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GLW
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-291.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$48.78B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
72.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $50.01
Fair Value: $180.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GLW
11.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 11.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $123.31
Fair Value: $138.76
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

GLW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $123?

+24.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +26.7%

The market implies +24.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +26.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GLW
36/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GLW
-2.38
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,517
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GLW
Insiders 8.1%Institutions 74.7%Retail & Other 17.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,126
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GLW
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GLW
2
Sells (3M)
26
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $76.66M
GULLO MICHELLE L
Officer
$1.50M
@ $152.29 · 2026-09-04
STEVERSON LEWIS A
Officer
$1.98M
@ $151.29 · 2026-08-28
WEEKS WENDELL P.
Chief Executive Officer
$18.65M
@ $186.46 · 2026-06-09
AMIN JAYMIN
Chief Technology Officer
$5.26M
@ $192.14 · 2026-05-22
NELSON AVERY H III
Chief Operating Officer
$3.92M
@ $195.93 · 2026-05-15
VERKLEEREN RONALD L
Officer
$2.08M
@ $207.77 · 2026-05-13
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$1.98M
@ $198.34 · 2026-05-11
SEETHARAM SOUMYA
Chief Technology Officer
$4.12M
@ $206.23 · 2026-05-11
TILLMAN MICHAUNE D.
General Counsel
$674,870
@ $207.02 · 2026-05-11
STEVERSON LEWIS A
Officer
$5.44M
@ $196.06 · 2026-05-08
GULLO MICHELLE L
Officer
$1.00M
@ $189.03 · 2026-05-08
BECKER STEFAN
Officer
$3.95M
@ $188.08 · 2026-05-08
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$4.20M
@ $186.08 · 2026-05-07
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$2.77M
@ $184.67 · 2026-05-06
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$204,765
@ $133.75 · 2026-02-12
NELSON AVERY H III
Chief Operating Officer
$203,800
@ $128.74 · 2026-02-11
STEVERSON LEWIS A
Officer
$2.00M
@ $130.22 · 2026-02-10
KAMMERUD JORDANA DARYL
Officer
$3.83M
@ $127.67 · 2026-02-09
NELSON AVERY H III
Chief Operating Officer
$812,722
@ $129.79 · 2026-02-09
MUSSER ERIC S.
Retired
$1.95M
@ $130.25 · 2026-02-09
FANG LI
Officer
$1.11M
@ $113.51 · 2026-02-04
O'DAY MICHAEL PAUL
Officer
$558,232
@ $110.52 · 2026-02-02
MUSSER ERIC S.
Retired
$2.75M
@ $110.00 · 2026-02-02
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$2.21M
@ $104.55 · 2026-01-29
VERKLEEREN RONALD L
Officer
$1.99M
@ $94.69 · 2025-12-10
SEETHARAM SOUMYA
Chief Technology Officer
$1.50M
@ $90.78 · 2025-12-10
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$1.91M
@ $91.25 · 2025-10-31
STEVERSON LEWIS A
Officer
$2.06M
@ $89.05 · 2025-10-31
BECKER STEFAN
Officer
$1.10M
@ $91.28 · 2025-10-29
MUSSER ERIC S.
Retired
$9.02M
@ $90.17 · 2025-10-29
AMIN JAYMIN
Chief Technology Officer
$1.37M
@ $77.18 · 2025-09-17
MUSSER ERIC S.
President
$1.40M
@ $70.23 · 2025-09-04
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$79,425
@ $65.53 · 2025-08-12
MUSSER ERIC S.
President
$1.23M
@ $65.31 · 2025-08-11
WEEKS WENDELL P.
Chief Executive Officer
$5.35M
@ $65.19 · 2025-08-07
MUSSER ERIC S.
President
$1.32M
@ $65.88 · 2025-08-07
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$877,013
@ $62.28 · 2025-07-30
STEVERSON LEWIS A
Officer
$1.04M
@ $62.22 · 2025-07-30
O'DAY MICHAEL PAUL
Officer
$927,912
@ $62.36 · 2025-07-30
NELSON AVERY H III
Chief Operating Officer
$2.26M
@ $62.26 · 2025-07-30
VERKLEEREN RONALD L
Officer
$1.01M
@ $50.52 · 2025-06-11
MUSSER ERIC S.
President
$1.02M
@ $51.11 · 2025-06-06
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$222,534
@ $49.85 · 2025-06-02
SEETHARAM SOUMYA
Chief Technology Officer
$325,285
@ $50.01 · 2025-05-29
BECKER STEFAN
Officer
$849,838
@ $49.68 · 2025-05-29
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$473,679
@ $49.29 · 2025-05-28
SEETHARAM SOUMYA
Chief Technology Officer
$715,797
@ $50.01 · 2025-05-28
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$375,294
@ $46.91 · 2025-05-12
BELL MICHAEL ALAN
Retired
$892,768
@ $44.06 · 2025-04-30
WEEKS WENDELL P.
Chief Executive Officer
$5.01M
@ $50.08 · 2025-02-28
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$218,518
@ $52.82 · 2025-02-19
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$744,757
@ $52.78 · 2025-02-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GLW
FearGreed
😨Fear(31/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
GLW
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
View BAC Full AnalysisView GLW Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs GLW

Is Bank of America Corporation or Corning Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to GLW's 11.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $139 vs. $123).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Corning Incorporated?▼

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while GLW scores 36/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GLW scores 4.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Corning Incorporated?▼

GLW earns 11.3% ROIC versus BAC's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Corning Incorporated's?▼

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to GLW's 63/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs GLW: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io