Compare Stocks › BAC vs GEHC

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (GEHC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BAC is undervalued at $50, with a DCF intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. GEHC is undervalued at $77, with an intrinsic value of $96 and a margin of safety of 20%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01
VS
GEHC
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
$76.57

Rewards

BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
GEHC
  • ★GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • ★8 insider purchases over the past 12 months with a buy/sell ratio above 3:1 — a sustained pattern of insider confidence.

Risks

BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
GEHC
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 5.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
GEHC
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.83B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.29%
11.94
Trailing P/E
16.19
9.64
Forward P/E
13.97
Quality & Moat
3.80%
ROIC
11.76%
10.73%
ROE
20.01%
0.00%
Gross Margin
39.28%
0.91
PEG Ratio
2.06
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.64
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.11
2.56%
Dividend Yield
0.21%
BAC: 4Ties: 1GEHC: 3
BACGEHC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GEHC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GEHC
$1.98
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$5.49B
Δ Market Cap
+$10.87B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
72.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $50.01
Fair Value: $180.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GEHC
20.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 20.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $76.57
Fair Value: $95.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

GEHC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $77?

+7.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.6%

The market implies +7.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GEHC
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GEHC
-2.36
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,517
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GEHC
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 5.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,708
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GEHC
0
Buys (3M)
8
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $6.42M
LOBO KEVIN A
Director
$641,800
@ $64.18 · 2026-05-22
HOCHMAN RODNEY F
Director
$100,365
@ $62.03 · 2026-05-12
YANG WATKIN PHOEBE L
Director
$63,006
@ $63.01 · 2026-05-08
CULP HENRY LAWRENCE JR.
Director
$5.00M
@ $61.88 · 2026-05-06
STROMBERG WILLIAM J
Director
$61,689
@ $61.69 · 2026-05-06
SACCARO JAMES
Chief Financial Officer
$200,585
@ $60.60 · 2026-05-01
ARDUINI PETER J
Chief Executive Officer
$249,827
@ $59.92 · 2026-04-30
JIMENEZ FRANK R
General Counsel
$105,788
@ $60.45 · 2026-04-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GEHC
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
NEWCOMB GEORGE A.
Officer
$185,080
@ $92.54 · 2025-02-18
ROTT ROLAND
Officer
$309,339
@ $86.48 · 2024-11-06
RACKLIFFE PHILIP
Chief Executive Officer
$78,867
@ $87.63 · 2024-11-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GEHC
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
GEHC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
View BAC Full AnalysisView GEHC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs GEHC

Is Bank of America Corporation or GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to GEHC's 20.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $96 vs. $77).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.?▼

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while GEHC scores 93/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GEHC scores 2.0 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.?▼

GEHC earns 11.8% ROIC versus BAC's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.'s?▼

GEHC's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). GEHC has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

BAC vs GEHC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io