Compare StocksBAC vs GD

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs General Dynamics Corporation (GD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. GD is fairly valued at $350, with an intrinsic value of $339 and a margin of safety of -3%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
$350.01

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
GD
  • General Dynamics Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • General Dynamics Corporation scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.35 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
GD
  • Gross margin of 15.2% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 5.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 2.71 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
GD
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$5.29B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.59%
13.95
Trailing P/E
21.75
11.13
Forward P/E
19.28
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
12.48%
10.64%
ROE
17.97%
0.00%
Gross Margin
15.24%
1.02
PEG Ratio
2.71
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.24
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.95
1.97%
Dividend Yield
1.75%
BAC: 4Ties: 1GD: 3
BACGD

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GD
$3.40
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.76B
Δ Market Cap
+$22.95B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GD
3.3% Overvalued
Price is 3.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $350.01
Fair Value: $338.69
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

GD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $350?

+10.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.0%

The market implies +10.2% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +7.0%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GD
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GD
-2.64
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GD
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 87.9%Retail & Other 11.5%
No. of Institutional Holders2,618
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GD
1
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $140.40M
BURNS MARK LAGRAND
Officer
$25.04M
@ $344.39 · 2026-05-12
GALLOPOULOS GREGORY S
General Counsel
$1.32M
@ $354.35 · 2026-03-11
GILLILAND MARGUERITE AMY
Officer
$1.35M
@ $353.50 · 2026-03-11
NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
Chief Executive Officer
$11.66M
@ $354.09 · 2026-03-11
BURNS MARK LAGRAND
Officer
$3.60M
@ $354.95 · 2026-03-11
RAYHA MARK
Officer
$1.52M
@ $348.79 · 2026-02-13
PADDOCK DAVID
Officer
$6.82M
@ $334.92 · 2025-12-17
RAYHA MARK
Officer
$33,990
@ $339.90 · 2025-11-20
MALCOLM MARK
Director
$1.06M
@ $329.45 · 2025-09-12
BRADY CHRISTOPHER J.
Officer
$2.62M
@ $321.17 · 2025-08-25
MALCOLM MARK
Director
$386,038
@ $319.04 · 2025-08-22
NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
Chief Executive Officer
$40.48M
@ $313.57 · 2025-08-18
MOSS WILLIAM A.
Officer
$5.60M
@ $316.40 · 2025-08-14
GILLILAND MARGUERITE AMY
Officer
$10.63M
@ $315.20 · 2025-08-08
PADDOCK DAVID
Officer
$1.93M
@ $312.26 · 2025-08-04
DE LEON RUDY F
Director
$1.72M
@ $312.81 · 2025-07-28
BURNS MARK LAGRAND
Officer
$23.92M
@ $312.99 · 2025-07-28
WALL PETER A.
Director
$710,038
@ $312.79 · 2025-07-25
NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
Chief Executive Officer
$52.77M
@ $283.02 · 2025-06-16
GALLOPOULOS GREGORY S
General Counsel
$12.00M
@ $284.16 · 2025-06-13
GILLILAND MARGUERITE AMY
Officer
$7.50M
@ $272.11 · 2025-03-10
GALLOPOULOS GREGORY S
General Counsel
$930,926
@ $263.42 · 2025-03-05
NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
Chief Executive Officer
$8.61M
@ $263.48 · 2025-03-05
SCHUMACHER LAURA J
Director
$459,205
@ $255.68 · 2025-01-31
BRADY CHRISTOPHER J.
Officer
$1.56M
@ $280.91 · 2024-11-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GD
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
GD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
View BAC Full AnalysisView GD Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs GD

Is Bank of America Corporation or General Dynamics Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to GD's -3.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $339 vs. $350).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or General Dynamics Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while GD scores 93/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GD scores 4.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or General Dynamics Corporation?

GD earns 12.5% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or General Dynamics Corporation's?

GD's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). GD has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs GD: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io