Compare Stocks › BAC vs GD

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs General Dynamics Corporation (GD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BAC is undervalued at $50, with a DCF intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. GD is overvalued at $373, with an intrinsic value of $317 and a margin of safety of -18%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01
VS
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
$372.59

Rewards

BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
GD
  • ★General Dynamics Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★General Dynamics Corporation scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.35 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
GD
  • ⚠Gross margin of 15.4% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.29 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $3.2M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
GD
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$4.55B
N/A
FCF Yield
4.52%
11.94
Trailing P/E
21.93
9.64
Forward P/E
19.82
Quality & Moat
3.80%
ROIC
12.90%
10.73%
ROE
18.01%
0.00%
Gross Margin
15.42%
0.91
PEG Ratio
2.29
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.17
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.68
2.56%
Dividend Yield
1.71%
BAC: 4Ties: 1GD: 3
BACGD

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GD
$3.40
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.76B
Δ Market Cap
+$22.95B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
72.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $50.01
Fair Value: $180.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GD
17.7% Overvalued
Price is 17.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $372.59
Fair Value: $316.67
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

GD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $373?

+10.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.7%

The market implies +10.8% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +9.7%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GD
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GD
-2.64
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,517
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GD
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 86.6%Retail & Other 12.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,626
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GD
2
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $92.61M
WALL PETER A.
Director
$788,898
@ $396.43 · 2026-08-10
BRADY CHRISTOPHER J.
Officer
$2.42M
@ $383.32 · 2026-08-05
NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
Chief Executive Officer
$19.73M
@ $382.58 · 2026-08-03
GILLILAND MARGUERITE AMY
Officer
$16.32M
@ $378.04 · 2026-07-31
MALCOLM MARK
Director
$2.00M
@ $365.00 · 2026-06-17
BURNS MARK LAGRAND
Officer
$25.04M
@ $344.39 · 2026-05-12
GALLOPOULOS GREGORY S
General Counsel
$1.32M
@ $354.35 · 2026-03-11
GILLILAND MARGUERITE AMY
Officer
$1.35M
@ $353.50 · 2026-03-11
BURNS MARK LAGRAND
Officer
$3.60M
@ $354.95 · 2026-03-11
NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
Chief Executive Officer
$11.66M
@ $354.09 · 2026-03-11
RAYHA MARK
Officer
$1.52M
@ $348.79 · 2026-02-13
PADDOCK DAVID
Officer
$6.82M
@ $334.92 · 2025-12-17
RAYHA MARK
Officer
$33,990
@ $339.90 · 2025-11-20
MALCOLM MARK
Director
$1.06M
@ $329.45 · 2025-09-12
BRADY CHRISTOPHER J.
Officer
$2.62M
@ $321.17 · 2025-08-25
MALCOLM MARK
Director
$386,038
@ $319.04 · 2025-08-22
NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
Chief Executive Officer
$40.48M
@ $313.57 · 2025-08-18
MOSS WILLIAM A.
Officer
$5.60M
@ $316.40 · 2025-08-14
GILLILAND MARGUERITE AMY
Officer
$10.63M
@ $315.20 · 2025-08-08
PADDOCK DAVID
Officer
$1.93M
@ $312.26 · 2025-08-04
BURNS MARK LAGRAND
Officer
$23.92M
@ $312.99 · 2025-07-28
DE LEON RUDY F
Director
$1.72M
@ $312.81 · 2025-07-28
WALL PETER A.
Director
$710,038
@ $312.79 · 2025-07-25
NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
Chief Executive Officer
$52.77M
@ $283.02 · 2025-06-16
GALLOPOULOS GREGORY S
General Counsel
$12.00M
@ $284.16 · 2025-06-13
GILLILAND MARGUERITE AMY
Officer
$7.50M
@ $272.11 · 2025-03-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GD
FearGreed
😏Greed(69/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
GD
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
View BAC Full AnalysisView GD Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs GD

Is Bank of America Corporation or General Dynamics Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to GD's -17.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $317 vs. $373).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or General Dynamics Corporation?▼

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while GD scores 93/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GD scores 4.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or General Dynamics Corporation?▼

GD earns 12.9% ROIC versus BAC's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or General Dynamics Corporation's?▼

GD's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). GD has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs GD: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io