Compare StocksBAC vs FIS

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS)

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$52.15
VS
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
$47.38

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.53 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
FIS
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 42.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 13% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Insiders have bought $1.1M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $20.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
FIS
  • FCF yield of 7.7% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.1x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.48 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
FIS
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.89B
N/A
FCF Yield
7.70%
12.97
Trailing P/E
64.90
10.34
Forward P/E
6.88
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
7.63%
N/A
ROE
2.75%
0.00%
Gross Margin
36.86%
0.53
PEG Ratio
0.74
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Debt / Equity
0.96
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.06
2.10%
Dividend Yield
3.61%
BAC: 2Ties: 1FIS: 4
BACFIS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

FIS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
FIS
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-7.70B
Δ Market Cap
$-5.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
60.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 60.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $52.15
Fair Value: $130.24
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
FIS
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $47.38
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

FIS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $47?

+29.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.5%

The market implies +29.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
FIS
56/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
FIS
-2.82
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.4%Institutions 71.5%Retail & Other 21.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,375
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
FIS
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 98.8%Retail & Other 1.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,345
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
FIS
2
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.24M
GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
Director
$56,726
@ $47.39 · 2026-04-15
FERRIS STEPHANIE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $50.39 · 2026-03-05
GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
Director
$60,328
@ $64.11 · 2026-01-15
GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
Director
$60,150
@ $67.66 · 2025-10-15
GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
Director
$60,023
@ $79.29 · 2025-07-15
GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
Director
$60,802
@ $72.04 · 2025-04-15
GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
Director
$56,059
@ $79.97 · 2025-01-15
GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
Director
$55,244
@ $88.25 · 2024-10-15
GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
Director
$55,226
@ $76.81 · 2024-07-15
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
5
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
FIS
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $125,020
TSAI CAROLINE
Officer
$125,020
@ $70.00 · 2025-09-09
WILLIAMS LENORE DENISE
Officer
$994,501
@ $87.97 · 2024-11-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
FIS
FearGreed
😨Fear(38/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
FIS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
View BAC Full AnalysisView FIS Full Analysis
BAC vs FIS: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io