Compare Stocks › BAC vs FIS

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BAC is undervalued at $50, with a DCF intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. FIS is overvalued at $39, with an intrinsic value of $12 and a margin of safety of -213%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01
VS
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
$38.55

Rewards

BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
FIS
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 42.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 13% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★FCF yield of 13.3% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
FIS
  • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 5.8x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.48 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
FIS
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$2.65B
N/A
FCF Yield
13.35%
11.94
Trailing P/E
5.92
9.64
Forward P/E
5.80
Quality & Moat
3.80%
ROIC
5.34%
10.73%
ROE
22.35%
0.00%
Gross Margin
35.84%
0.91
PEG Ratio
0.20
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
1.28
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.82
2.56%
Dividend Yield
4.57%
BAC: 0Ties: 1FIS: 7
BACFIS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

FIS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
FIS
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-7.70B
Δ Market Cap
$-5.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
72.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $50.01
Fair Value: $180.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
FIS
212.9% Overvalued
Price is 212.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $38.55
Fair Value: $12.32
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

FIS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $39?

+13.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.0%

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
FIS
56/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
FIS
-2.82
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,517
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
FIS
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 101.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,242
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
FIS
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.17M
GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
Director
$57,367
@ $41.39 · 2026-07-15
GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
Director
$56,726
@ $47.39 · 2026-04-15
FERRIS STEPHANIE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $50.39 · 2026-03-05
GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
Director
$60,328
@ $64.11 · 2026-01-15
GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
Director
$60,150
@ $67.66 · 2025-10-15
GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
Director
$60,023
@ $79.29 · 2025-07-15
GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
Director
$60,802
@ $72.04 · 2025-04-15
GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
Director
$56,059
@ $79.97 · 2025-01-15
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
FIS
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
TSAI CAROLINE
Officer
$125,020
@ $70.00 · 2025-09-09
WILLIAMS LENORE DENISE
Officer
$994,501
@ $87.97 · 2024-11-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
FIS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(43/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
FIS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
View BAC Full AnalysisView FIS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs FIS

Is Bank of America Corporation or Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to FIS's -212.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $12 vs. $39).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.?▼

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while FIS scores 56/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. FIS scores 0.5 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.?▼

FIS earns 5.3% ROIC versus BAC's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.'s?▼

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to FIS's 48/100 (Borderline). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs FIS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io