Compare StocksBAC vs EXE

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Expand Energy Corporation (EXE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. EXE is overvalued at $89, with an intrinsic value of $59 and a margin of safety of -49%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.59
VS
EXE
Expand Energy Corporation
$88.70

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
EXE
  • 6 insider purchases over the past 12 months with a buy/sell ratio above 3:1 — a sustained pattern of insider confidence.
  • PEG ratio of 0.88 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
EXE
  • ROIC has declined by 14.6 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Expand Energy Corporation scores only 21/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Share count has increased by 78% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
EXE
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.47B
N/A
FCF Yield
7.14%
13.30
Trailing P/E
7.65
10.88
Forward P/E
10.19
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
11.38%
11.20%
ROE
14.89%
0.00%
Gross Margin
47.07%
0.90
PEG Ratio
0.88
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.16
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.46
2.21%
Dividend Yield
2.59%
BAC: 0Ties: 2EXE: 6
BACEXE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

EXE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
EXE
$7.27
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.88B
Δ Market Cap
+$13.69B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.59
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
EXE
49.5% Overvalued
Price is 49.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $88.70
Fair Value: $59.34
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

EXE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $89?

+4.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
EXE
21/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
EXE
-2.98
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
EXE
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 96.4%Retail & Other 3.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,176
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
EXE
0
Buys (3M)
6
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $876,540
WICHTERICH MICHAEL A.
Chief Executive Officer
$88,900
@ $88.90 · 2026-06-12
TEUNISSEN MARCEL
Chief Financial Officer
$185,760
@ $92.88 · 2026-06-04
WICHTERICH MICHAEL A.
Chief Executive Officer
$93,360
@ $93.36 · 2026-06-04
TEUNISSEN MARCEL
Chief Financial Officer
$192,860
@ $96.43 · 2026-05-07
WICHTERICH MICHAEL A.
Chief Executive Officer
$215,000
@ $107.50 · 2026-03-06
GALLAGHER MATTHEW
Director
$100,660
@ $100.66 · 2026-02-19
VIETS JOSHUA J
Chief Operating Officer
$184,320
@ $92.16 · 2025-08-18
DELL'OSSO DOMENIC J. JR.
Chief Executive Officer
$239,650
@ $95.86 · 2025-08-15
DELL'OSSO DOMENIC J. JR.
Chief Executive Officer
$248,750
@ $99.50 · 2025-03-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
EXE
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
KEHR CATHERINE A
Director
$4.34M
@ $99.58 · 2024-11-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
EXE
FearGreed
😨Fear(31/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
EXE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
View BAC Full AnalysisView EXE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs EXE

Is Bank of America Corporation or Expand Energy Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to EXE's -49.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $59 vs. $89).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Expand Energy Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while EXE scores 21/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EXE scores 2.6 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Expand Energy Corporation?

EXE earns 11.4% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Expand Energy Corporation's?

EXE's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). EXE has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.