Compare StocksBAC vs ESS

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS)

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$53.24
VS
ESS
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
$263.35

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.54 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
ESS
  • Gross margin of 68.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
ESS
  • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 7.02 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
ESS
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$983.00M
N/A
FCF Yield
5.42%
13.24
Trailing P/E
29.59
10.56
Forward P/E
44.40
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
4.38%
N/A
ROE
11.90%
0.00%
Gross Margin
68.88%
0.54
PEG Ratio
7.02
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Debt / Equity
1.22
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.33
2.10%
Dividend Yield
3.91%
BAC: 3Ties: 1ESS: 3
BACESS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

ESS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ESS
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-44.5M
Δ Market Cap
+$3.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $53.24
Fair Value: $130.24
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ESS
406.5% Overvalued
Price is 406.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $263.35
Fair Value: $51.99
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

ESS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $263?

+16.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.0%

The market implies +16.2% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +11.0%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ESS
63/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ESS
-2.47
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.4%Institutions 71.5%Retail & Other 21.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,375
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ESS
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 103.6%
No. of Institutional Holders925
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ESS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ESS
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
KASARIS MARY
Director
$842,240
@ $300.80 · 2025-03-11
KLEIMAN ANGELA L
Chief Executive Officer
$1.68M
@ $315.00 · 2025-03-04
GUERICKE KEITH R
Director
$2.30M
@ $315.00 · 2025-03-03
PAK BARBARA
Chief Financial Officer
$1.99M
@ $314.79 · 2025-03-03
MORRISON ANNE
General Counsel
$809,325
@ $314.79 · 2025-03-03
JOHNSON AMAL M
Director
$2.31M
@ $316.31 · 2024-09-17
KLEIMAN ANGELA L
Chief Executive Officer
$2.55M
@ $315.10 · 2024-09-16
MORRISON ANNE
General Counsel
$809,325
@ $314.79 · 2024-09-16
JOHNSON AMAL M
Director
$735,900
@ $300.00 · 2024-08-30
KLEIMAN ANGELA L
Chief Executive Officer
$1.05M
@ $278.27 · 2024-06-21
GUERICKE KEITH R
Director
$2.75M
@ $274.57 · 2024-06-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ESS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
ESS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View BAC Full AnalysisView ESS Full Analysis
BAC vs ESS: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io