Compare StocksBAC vs EQT

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs EQT Corporation (EQT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. EQT is overvalued at $51, with an intrinsic value of $30 and a margin of safety of -67%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
EQT
EQT Corporation
$50.72

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
EQT
  • Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.91 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
EQT
  • ROIC has declined by 27.6 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • EQT Corporation scores only 4/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Share count has increased by 71% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
EQT
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$2.50B
N/A
FCF Yield
7.89%
13.95
Trailing P/E
9.62
11.13
Forward P/E
10.95
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
12.20%
10.64%
ROE
13.40%
0.00%
Gross Margin
80.97%
1.02
PEG Ratio
2.33
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.20
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.74
1.97%
Dividend Yield
1.26%
BAC: 2Ties: 2EQT: 4
BACEQT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

EQT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
EQT
$6.89
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.06B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.09B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
EQT
66.8% Overvalued
Price is 66.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $50.72
Fair Value: $30.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

EQT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $51?

+3.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market above historical growth — verify catalysts.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
EQT
4/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
EQT
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
EQT
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 93.7%Retail & Other 5.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,537
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
EQT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
EQT
2
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $15.50M
RICE TOBY Z
Chief Executive Officer
$5.36M
@ $54.26 · 2026-06-08
BAILEY VICKY A
Director
$246,137
@ $59.80 · 2026-04-27
FENTON SARAH
Officer
$314,453
@ $64.49 · 2026-03-16
BOLEN J.E.B.
Officer
$491,248
@ $64.35 · 2026-03-12
EVANCHO LESLEY
Officer
$1.21M
@ $60.69 · 2026-03-03
KNOP JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$1.23M
@ $61.65 · 2026-02-27
JAMES TODD M.
Officer
$1.99M
@ $61.12 · 2026-02-23
FENTON SARAH
Officer
$227,474
@ $60.37 · 2026-02-20
JORDAN WILLIAM E
Officer
$3.49M
@ $60.63 · 2025-11-11
BOLEN J.E.B.
Officer
$75,067
@ $52.79 · 2025-10-28
BAILEY VICKY A
Director
$219,594
@ $51.56 · 2025-08-06
FENTON SARAH
Officer
$646,030
@ $51.94 · 2025-07-25
KNOP JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$368,016
@ $51.00 · 2025-04-28
KARAM THOMAS F
Director
$1.50M
@ $48.74 · 2025-03-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
EQT
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
EQT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
View BAC Full AnalysisView EQT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs EQT

Is Bank of America Corporation or EQT Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to EQT's -66.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $30 vs. $51).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or EQT Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while EQT scores 4/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EQT scores 1.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or EQT Corporation?

EQT earns 12.2% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or EQT Corporation's?

EQT's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). EQT has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.