Compare StocksBAC vs EOG

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. EOG is fairly valued at $145, with an intrinsic value of $153 and a margin of safety of 5%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.90
VS
EOG
EOG Resources, Inc.
$144.93

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
EOG
  • EOG Resources, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 62.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
EOG
  • FCF yield of 5.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Insiders have sold $6.6M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 17.3% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
EOG
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$4.48B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.89%
13.37
Trailing P/E
11.27
10.94
Forward P/E
9.84
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
21.43%
11.20%
ROE
22.51%
0.00%
Gross Margin
62.64%
0.90
PEG Ratio
1.41
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.10
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.23
2.21%
Dividend Yield
2.82%
BAC: 1Ties: 1EOG: 6
BACEOG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

EOG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
EOG
$-1.73
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$11.34B
Δ Market Cap
$-19.66B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.90
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
EOG
5.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 5.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $144.93
Fair Value: $153.07
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

EOG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $145?

+6.1%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
EOG
53/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
EOG
-3.06
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
EOG
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 98.1%Retail & Other 1.6%
No. of Institutional Holders2,132
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
EOG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$755.00
@ $107.86 · 2025-05-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
EOG
2
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.17M
DONALDSON MICHAEL P
Officer
$1.09M
@ $148.00 · 2026-09-11
YACOB EZRA Y
Chief Executive Officer
$5.47M
@ $152.10 · 2026-08-24
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$256,953
@ $136.17 · 2026-05-28
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$856,523
@ $150.32 · 2026-03-31
JANSSEN ANN D
Chief Financial Officer
$348,814
@ $134.31 · 2026-03-12
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$484,535
@ $128.39 · 2026-03-03
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$250,000
@ $125.00 · 2026-02-19
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$211,360
@ $105.68 · 2025-12-31
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$211,662
@ $112.05 · 2025-09-30
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$190,657
@ $119.99 · 2025-08-15
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$472,857
@ $119.65 · 2025-07-01
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$515,772
@ $127.76 · 2025-04-01
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$483,560
@ $120.89 · 2024-12-31
CLARK JANET F
Director
$76,867
@ $135.33 · 2024-11-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
EOG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
EOG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View BAC Full AnalysisView EOG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs EOG

Is Bank of America Corporation or EOG Resources, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to EOG's 5.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $153 vs. $145).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or EOG Resources, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while EOG scores 53/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EOG scores 3.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or EOG Resources, Inc.?

EOG earns 21.4% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or EOG Resources, Inc.'s?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to EOG's 73/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.