Compare StocksBAC vs EOG

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. EOG is fairly valued at $130, with an intrinsic value of $149 and a margin of safety of 13%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
EOG
EOG Resources, Inc.
$129.98

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
EOG
  • EOG Resources, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 62.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
EOG
  • 9 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 17.3% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
EOG
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$2.86B
N/A
FCF Yield
4.14%
13.95
Trailing P/E
12.78
11.13
Forward P/E
8.77
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
17.99%
10.64%
ROE
18.20%
0.00%
Gross Margin
61.99%
1.02
PEG Ratio
1.06
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.14
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.35
1.97%
Dividend Yield
3.09%
BAC: 0Ties: 2EOG: 6
BACEOG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

EOG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
EOG
$-1.73
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$11.34B
Δ Market Cap
$-19.66B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
EOG
12.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 12.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $129.98
Fair Value: $148.65
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

EOG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $130?

+11.1%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
EOG
53/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
EOG
-3.06
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
EOG
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 97.8%Retail & Other 2.0%
No. of Institutional Holders2,099
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
EOG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$755.00
@ $107.86 · 2025-05-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
EOG
2
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.28M
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$256,953
@ $136.17 · 2026-05-28
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$856,523
@ $150.32 · 2026-03-31
JANSSEN ANN D
Chief Financial Officer
$348,814
@ $134.31 · 2026-03-12
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$484,535
@ $128.39 · 2026-03-03
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$250,000
@ $125.00 · 2026-02-19
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$211,360
@ $105.68 · 2025-12-31
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$211,662
@ $112.05 · 2025-09-30
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$190,657
@ $119.99 · 2025-08-15
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$472,857
@ $119.65 · 2025-07-01
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$515,772
@ $127.76 · 2025-04-01
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$483,560
@ $120.89 · 2024-12-31
CLARK JANET F
Director
$76,867
@ $135.33 · 2024-11-19
DONALDSON MICHAEL P
General Counsel
$1.43M
@ $129.50 · 2024-08-26
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$816,405
@ $125.60 · 2024-08-21
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$505,920
@ $126.48 · 2024-08-09
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
EOG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(47/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
EOG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
View BAC Full AnalysisView EOG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs EOG

Is Bank of America Corporation or EOG Resources, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to EOG's 12.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $149 vs. $130).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or EOG Resources, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while EOG scores 53/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EOG scores 3.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or EOG Resources, Inc.?

EOG earns 18.0% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or EOG Resources, Inc.'s?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to EOG's 73/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.