Compare StocksBAC vs EOG

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, BAC is undervalued at $62, with a DCF intrinsic value of $966181785898 and a margin of safety of 100%. EOG is fairly valued at $149, with an intrinsic value of $149 and a margin of safety of -0%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$61.95
VS
EOG
EOG Resources, Inc.
$148.69

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
EOG
  • EOG Resources, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 62.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.14 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
EOG
  • Trailing P/E of 14.6x is 42% above the historical average of 10.3x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • 8 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 17.3% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
EOG
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$2.86B
N/A
FCF Yield
3.62%
14.31
Trailing P/E
14.62
11.74
Forward P/E
10.12
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
17.99%
11.20%
ROE
18.20%
0.00%
Gross Margin
61.99%
1.06
PEG Ratio
1.19
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.14
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.35
2.07%
Dividend Yield
2.74%
BAC: 1Ties: 2EOG: 5
BACEOG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

EOG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.88
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
EOG
$-1.73
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$11.34B
Δ Market Cap
$-19.66B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $61.95
Fair Value: $966181785897.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
EOG
0.0% Overvalued
Price is 0.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $148.69
Fair Value: $148.65
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

EOG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $149?

+12.8%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
EOG
53/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
EOG
-3.06
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.4%Institutions 71.4%Retail & Other 21.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,431
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
EOG
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 97.6%Retail & Other 2.1%
No. of Institutional Holders2,093
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
EOG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$755.00
@ $107.86 · 2025-05-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
EOG
1
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.81M
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$256,953
@ $136.17 · 2026-05-28
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$856,523
@ $150.32 · 2026-03-31
JANSSEN ANN D
Chief Financial Officer
$348,814
@ $134.31 · 2026-03-12
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$484,535
@ $128.39 · 2026-03-03
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$250,000
@ $125.00 · 2026-02-19
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$211,360
@ $105.68 · 2025-12-31
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$211,662
@ $112.05 · 2025-09-30
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$190,657
@ $119.99 · 2025-08-15
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$472,857
@ $119.65 · 2025-07-01
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$515,772
@ $127.76 · 2025-04-01
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$483,560
@ $120.89 · 2024-12-31
CLARK JANET F
Director
$76,867
@ $135.33 · 2024-11-19
DONALDSON MICHAEL P
General Counsel
$1.43M
@ $129.50 · 2024-08-26
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$816,405
@ $125.60 · 2024-08-21
LEITZELL JEFFREY R
Chief Operating Officer
$505,920
@ $126.48 · 2024-08-09
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
EOG
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
EOG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
View BAC Full AnalysisView EOG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs EOG

Is Bank of America Corporation or EOG Resources, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $966181785898 vs. price $62), compared to EOG's -0.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $149 vs. $149).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or EOG Resources, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while EOG scores 53/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EOG scores 3.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or EOG Resources, Inc.?

EOG earns 18.0% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or EOG Resources, Inc.'s?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to EOG's 73/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.