Compare StocksBAC vs EMR

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Emerson Electric Co. (EMR)

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$47.01
VS
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
$129.90

Rewards

BAC
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.37 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.58 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
EMR
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.29 of market value — management is creating shareholder value.
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.10 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Bank of America Corporation scores only 20/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
EMR
  • Trailing P/E of 31.8x is 41% above the historical average of 22.6x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 6.50 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
EMR
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$2.88B
N/A
FCF Yield
3.94%
12.34
Trailing P/E
31.84
9.49
Forward P/E
18.10
Quality & Moat
4.61%
ROIC
10.29%
N/A
ROE
11.30%
0.00%
Gross Margin
52.76%
0.58
PEG Ratio
6.50
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Debt / Equity
0.69
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.09
2.38%
Dividend Yield
1.71%
BAC: 4Ties: 1EMR: 2
BACEMR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

EMR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
EMR
$1.29
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$13.89B
Δ Market Cap
+$17.88B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
64.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 64.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $47.01
Fair Value: $131.82
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
EMR
63.7% Overvalued
Price is 63.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $129.90
Fair Value: $79.33
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

EMR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $130?

+16.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.1%

The market implies +16.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
20/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
EMR
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
EMR
-2.75
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC

No ownership data available.

EMR
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 84.4%Retail & Other 15.4%
No. of Institutional Holders2,782
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
EMR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
EMR
3
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $6.09M
LEVATICH MATTHEW S
Director
$239,349
@ $162.16 · 2026-02-10
PIAZZA NICHOLAS J
Officer
$1.07M
@ $159.07 · 2026-02-09
BLINN MARK A
Director
$438,930
@ $152.62 · 2026-02-05
KARSANBHAI SURENDRALAL LANCA
Chief Executive Officer
$965,979
@ $133.00 · 2025-12-03
TRAIN MICHAEL H
Officer
$3.38M
@ $119.44 · 2025-05-12
BLINN MARK A
Director
$2,505
@ $125.25 · 2025-02-12
LEVATICH MATTHEW S
Director
$233,472
@ $125.05 · 2025-02-12
BLINN MARK A
Director
$234,701
@ $125.71 · 2025-02-10
TRAIN MICHAEL H
Officer
$2.71M
@ $125.96 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
No sentiment data available for this stock.
EMR
FearGreed
😨Fear(40/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
EMR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (40)
View BAC Full AnalysisView EMR Full Analysis